8
$\begingroup$

In Chapters 34-36 of the Srednicki QFT book, 2-component spinors and their combinations in Dirac and Majorana spinors are carefully constructed. Specifically, in equations 36.14 and 36.15 the following left-handed spinors are defined:

$$ \begin{equation} \begin{split} &\chi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1 + i\psi_2)\\ &\xi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1 - i\psi_2) \end{split} \end{equation} $$

A couple of pages later, charge conjugation is then defined as "Charge conjugation simply exchanges $\chi$ and $\xi$".

Now, I have read in other books (e.g. Georgi) that if a particle is defined in one SU(2) representation of the Lorentz group (e.g. as left handed spinor), then the corresponding anti-particle is in the other representation (e.g. as right handed spinor).However, in the above definition in Srednicki, both fermion and anti-fermion are left-handed spinors.

Have I got this right? How can both of these statements be correct? Any help to clear up my confusion would be greatly appreciated.

As an aside, I have a more general issue understanding the intuition behind Dirac spinors. The state of a general fermion or anti-fermion is often given with a Dirac spinor $\Psi$. If this fermion has mass, then the fermion is a combination of a left-handed and right handed spinor, as in Srednicki: $$ \Psi = \begin{pmatrix} \chi_c \\ \xi^{\dagger\dot{c}} \end{pmatrix}. $$

As helicity and handedness are frame dependent, I can kind of understand how the Dirac fermion can be a combination of the two above. However, Dirac fermions can also by viewed as a combination of a fermion and anti-fermion in much the same way. I do not fully understand this. How can a fermion with mass be described by a field that is partly particle and partly anti-particle?

Again, any insights that the community could provide would be much appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm working on turning this into an answer, but I think this will be a useful read. (If someone else wants to post an answer before I get to it, go right ahead.) $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Jun 9, 2014 at 22:52
  • $\begingroup$ Somebody asked me the same question (in private) a month or so ago; she returned to me with this pdf which helped her immensely; I wonder if it helps you too, c.f., pages 199-201 physics.indiana.edu/~dermisek/QFT_09/qft-I-9-4p.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Autolatry
    Nov 13, 2014 at 9:11

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Fermion is left-handed spinor and anti-fermion is right-handed spinor.

Firstly, you can see that $\xi = \chi ^{\dagger}$. From Sredniski, "... that hermitian conjugation swaps the two SU(2) Lie algebras...the hermitian conjugate of a field in the (2,1) representation should be a field in the (1,2) representation"... Thus $\chi$ is a right-handed fermion while $\xi$ the opposite.

Maybe you should read Chap.34, especially between eqn. (34.10) to (34.13)...

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.