0
$\begingroup$

You have a rigid body with 1 fixed point in space (the origin).

It's self-explanatory how to get the following equation for the angular momentum:

$\vec L = \sum_n m_n\vec r_n\times\vec v_n$

Where you take the sum of all "$n$" indicates all "$n$" points of mass.
This can be transformed into:

$\vec L = \sum_n m_n(\vec\omega(r_n^2)-(\vec\omega.\vec r_n)\vec r_n)$

Now, out of this, I have to get the following:

For component "$i$" of this equation, you get:
$L_i = \sum_n m_n(r_n^2\omega_i-x_{ni}\sum_j\omega_jx_{nj})$

I understand that for component "$i$", the scalars $m_n$ and $r_n^2$ are the same as for the other components, I also understand that for component "$i$" I need to take the $\omega_i$ component.
But what is meant with everything that follows after that? What does the "$x$" indicate for example? Does the "$j$" indicate the other components?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/a/91246/392 $\endgroup$ – ja72 Aug 10 '14 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ How is $L_i$ defined in relation to $\vec{L}$? Is this a transformation from the pivot center, to the center of mass? A diagram would help here in order to define the quantities. $\endgroup$ – ja72 Aug 10 '14 at 15:57
1
$\begingroup$

While typing this out it clicked for me and I figured it out.
Might as well type the full explanation after typing the question:

Starting from left to right for component "$i$":

  • The variables $m_n$ and $r_n^2$ are scalars and so they are the same as for the other components.

  • The $\omega_i$ component is self-explanatory as it has the same direction as $L_i$.

  • The $x_{ni}$ is to be interpreted as following: "$x$" is a distance (This doesn't indicate your x-component, which had me confused earlier), "$n$" indicates it's for mass-point "$n$" and the $"i"$ indicates it's the $"i"$ component.

  • The $\sum_j$ indicates the sum for ALL components (e.g. If you have $x$, $y$ and $z$ components and $i$ is $x$, then $j$ is the sum for $x$, $y$, and $z$.)

  • The variables of the summation are to be interpreted in a similar way as earlier.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.