# Is nature symmetric between particles and antiparticles?

Is nature symmetric with respect to presence of particles? Do we have an antiparticle for every particle thought of? Are there any proven examples where we don't have an antiparticle? And what about antiparticle of a photon (we know it can also behave as a particle)?

• do we discuss symmetry and anti-symmetry only when we have charged particles? Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 4:05
• en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antineutron Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 4:13
• @Dan you mean to say that we also discuss symmetry or anti symmetry based on spin? Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 4:16
• Are you just asking whether every known particle has an antiparticle (and vice-versa)? Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 4:32
• @David yes thats what I am asking Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 4:33

The anti-particle for any particle is obtained by charge C and parity P conjugation. C is the operation that interchanges positive and negative charges and P is the operation that reflects in a mirror. The combined operation of CP must produce a particle of the same mass. This is a theorem of relativistic quantum field theory due to CPT symmetry. This other particle is either the same particle or an antiparticle with opposite charge and/or chirality.

Some particles such a photons, gluons, Z bosons, pions, Higgs, graviton etc, do not have anti-particles because they are invariant under the CP transformation. You can say that they are their own anti-particle. This can only happen for particles without electric charge and with no chirality.

In principle the QCD color charge is also reversed for an anti-particle. This suggests that a gluon should not be regarded as its own anti-particle, but since colourless states are never seen the distinction cannot really be made in any operational sense.

All known particles which are their own anti-particle are bosons, but it is also possible for a fermion to be its own anti-particle if it is a Majorana spinor rather than a Dirac spinor. No known fermions are of this type (unless neutrinos are Majorana) but they exist in SUSY models.

Observed elementary particles that do have anti-particles include all the quarks and leptons (except possibly the neutrinos) and the charged W bosons. Any composite particle also has an antiparticle made of the anti-particles of its constituents. This can only be its own anti-particle if all its constituents are (e.g. a glueball), or if it is made of particle/anti-particle combinations as is the case for pions.

• Nice reminder on the Majorana spinors. Commented Jun 26, 2011 at 4:07
• if boson is an anti-particle of boson can two bosons stay together or they annihilate ? Commented Jun 26, 2011 at 12:32
• If you put a charged particle and its anti-particle together they can form a bound state. After a short instant they will annihilate, if they don't decay individually first. For example you can combine an electron and a positron to form positronium. Same thing could be done with bosons in principle but there are no good examples. Does that answer the question? Commented Jun 26, 2011 at 17:17

Theoretically, for every known particle there is an anti-particle. But bosons are their own antiparticle, for example, the $\pi^+$ which is (mostly) composed of an up-quark and a down-antiquark $u\bar{d}$, has as an anti particle the $\pi^- = d\bar{u}$. The antiparticle of the photon is just the photon, while the antiparticle of the $W^+$ is the $W^-$.

Composite particles, such as the hydrogen atom, also have corresponding antiparticles, but not all of them have been observed. So far the heaviest antimatter atom observed is anti-helium, but theoretically, it seems clear that anti-uranium could be produced.

• Not all bosons are their own antiparticle. Only the photon, Z and gluon are. Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 11:46
• To be somewhat pedantic, the heaviest antimatter atom that has been observed is anti-hydrogen. While antimatter atomic nuclei of deuterium, tritium, Helium-3, and Helium-4 (aka alpha particle) have been produced, to my knowledge the actual atoms (bound states of the anti-nuclei and positrons) have not yet been observed. Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 12:09
• @Willie: "Anti-Helium Discovered in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Experiment" sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110424152441.htm Commented Jun 25, 2011 at 21:27
• @Hans: at the bottom of the news article you cite, you have the link to the actual journal article, whose title is: "Observation of the antimatter helium-4 nucleus". :-) I have that particular issue of Nature sitting right next to me on the couch right now (I just read the issue three days ago), so I was pretty sure about what I wrote. Commented Jun 26, 2011 at 0:05
• @Willie; A "helium nuclei" is an atom. If this is news to you, look up the wikipedia definitions of "ion" and "atom". Commented Jun 26, 2011 at 4:00