3
$\begingroup$

I'm aware of the so-called group index but why is the phase velocity used in the standard definition of the index of refraction? What advantage does this offer?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is a strange question. If you want to talk about "c / group velocity", you call it "group index". If you want to talk about "c / phase velocity", you call it "index of refraction". It's just terminology! Those terms are as good as any. I think what you're really wondering is: "Why are there zillions of formulas that involve index of refraction, and very few formulas that involve group index?" $\endgroup$ – Steve Byrnes Jun 4 '14 at 3:30
  • $\begingroup$ @SteveB Yes, as I said you can define $n$ using phase velocity or group velocity, but why 99% of books and articles uses phase velocity? It just can't be a convention!! $\endgroup$ – Paracosmiste Jun 4 '14 at 9:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. You cannot define index of refraction using group velocity. "Index of refraction" has a specific meaning in physics. It is a meaning that everybody learns and uses -- 100% of people, not 99%. Likewise, "group index" has a specific (different) definition. Let me ask you: "Why does the word 'velocity' always refer to the time-derivative of position, and never refers to the mass of Jupiter?" The answer is, because it's the way language works. Words have definitions. Otherwise communication would be impossible! $\endgroup$ – Steve Byrnes Jun 4 '14 at 12:22
  • $\begingroup$ @SteveB Well, one of my professors defined it using the group velocity, but he's quite senile. $\endgroup$ – jinawee Jun 4 '14 at 19:09
3
+50
$\begingroup$

Well at the most fundamental level, the index of refraction of a material is defined as

$ n = \sqrt {\epsilon \mu} $

where $\epsilon $ is the electric permittivity and $\mu$ is the magnetic permeability of the material.

This arises from the solution of Maxwell's equations in a medium.

Also arising from the wave equation, which can be derived from Maxwell's equations, is that the index of refraction is the speed of light in vacuum, $c$ divided by the speed of light in the material $c_m$.

$ n ={ c \over c_m} $

Worth noting is that since $c_m$ is always less than $c$ , the index of refraction is always greater than 1.

Now the phase velocity for an electromagnetic wave of angular frequency $\omega$ is given by

$v_p = {\omega \over k}$ where $k= {2\pi \over\lambda_m}$ is the magnitude of the wave vector and $\lambda_m$ is the wavelength in the medium.

So after a little algebra, we find that the wave vector and index of refraction are related by

$k ={ n\omega \over c}$

Where does all this come into play in refraction and Snell's Law? Well, it is the wave vector that comes into play in satisfying the boundary conditions on the electric (and magnetic) fields at the interface between two media.

To see this, let's look at the simple case of a plane wave of monochromatic light incident on the interface between two media with indices of refraction $n_1$ and $n_2$:

enter image description here

In this simple case, considering the boundary conditions on the electric field at the interface is sufficient to derive Snell's Law.

The boundary condition is given by equation (1) in the diagram, namely that the incident and reflected electric fields minus the transmitted electric field must be zero, or equivalently that the total electric field at the interface must be continuous.

Since we defined y=0 as the plane of the interface, this boundary condition must hold for any value of x. This leads after a little algebra to equation (2) in the diagram. This equation depends only on the angles of incidence $\phi_{inc}$ and refraction $\phi_{tr}$, the wave vector magnitudes in both media $k_1$ and $k_2$, and the transmission and reflection coefficients $T$ and $R$ ( the fraction of energy that is transmitted into the new medium and reflected into the old medium respectively). By symmetry, $\phi_{inc} = \phi_{refl}$.

Because the left side of Equation 2 is independent of angle, so must the right side be. This leads to the term in the exponential being zero, which leads directly to Snell's Law, using the relation between wave vector and index of refraction shown above.

The group velocity never comes into play in the boundary conditions of refraction. It does come into play in the propagation of energy in the media (as opposed to the fields), but that's another question.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Refraction is the phenomenon where light bends when it enters a medium, as described by Snell's law. The amount of bending depends on the phase velocity. I don't know the real linguistic history, but I bet that is why somebody came up with the term "index of refraction" or "refractive index" to refer to "c / phase velocity".

By the way, it is misleading to say that "c / phase velocity" is the "standard definition" of "index of refraction". It is actually the only definition of "index of refraction". If someone uses the specific phrase "index of refraction" to refer to anything else, then they are using the phrase incorrectly.

Next, the term "group index" is a combination of the word "group" (suggesting the relation with group velocity) and the word "index" (suggesting its analogous mathematical form to refractive index).

Rarely, some people use the terms "group index of refraction" or "group refractive index" as a synonym of "group index". Again, I don't know the linguistic history, but I bet it's a back-formation -- I mean, people probably learned the (correct) term "group index" and then presumed (incorrectly) that it was an abbreviated version of "group index of refraction". The term "group index of refraction" is a bit weird if you think about it, because as I said it has nothing to do with the phenomenon of refraction. But it's no big deal. It doesn't create confusion. It is an unambiguous term, because everyone knows that you are not allowed to shorten the phrase "group index of refraction" by dropping the word "group".

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Refraction can be described by the Huygen's-Fresnel principle just like diffraction. In this interpretation it is an interference phenomenon with every point on the wave front acting as a source, and the light propagating only in those directions where the phases reinforce.

And this is the key point. The phase change in a distance $d$ is given by:

$$ \Delta\phi = 2\pi \frac{df}{v_p} $$

where $f$ is the frequency of the light (which is a constant) and $v_p$ is the phase velocity. Since the phase velocity determines the phase change, it also determines how the light refracts. That's why it's the phase velocity that determines the refractive index.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would an analogue of Snel's law exist using group velocity (I guess not)? $\endgroup$ – jinawee Jun 4 '14 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.