# Why is BTZ black hole asymptotically $AdS_3$?

The metric for the BTZ black hole is

$ds^2=-N^2dt^2+N^{-2}dr^2+r^2(N^\phi dt +d\phi)^2$

where $N^2=-M+\frac{r^2}{l^2}+\frac{J^2}{4r^2}$ and $N^\phi=-\frac{J}{2r^2}$.

It is often said that BTZ black hole is asymptotically AdS$_3$, but if I take $r\rightarrow \infty$ limit, then the BTZ metric, to the leading order of each component, becomes

$ds^2\rightarrow-\frac{r^2}{l^2}dt^2+\frac{l^2}{r^2}dr^2+r^2d\phi^2-Jdtd\phi,$

while the AdS$_3$ metric reads, asymptotically,

$ds^2_{AdS_3}\rightarrow-\frac{r^2}{l^2}dt^2+\frac{l^2}{r^2}dr^2+r^2d\phi^2.$

My question is that since the off-diagonal term $-Jdtd\phi$ doesn't approach to zero at infinity, how can one claim that BTZ is asymptotically AdS$_3$?

While there are more mathematical definitions available, an appropriate working definition of locally asymptotically $\textrm{AdS}_3$ is that the line-element in Gaussian normal coordinates for $\rho\to\infty$ must take the form \begin{equation} ds^2 = d\rho^2 + (\gamma_{ij}^{(0)} e^{2\rho} + {\rm subleading}_{ij}) dx^i dx^j \end{equation} where $\gamma_{ij}^{(0)}$ is the 2-dimensional Minkowski metric and "subleading" means "not diverging as fast as $e^{2\rho}$".

You can easily convince yourself that the BTZ black hole (and any other asymptotic AdS$_3$ space-time you might have encountered) can be written in this form.

In 3-dimensional vacuum Einstein gravity the asymptotic solutions to the equations of motion imply that the subleading terms must fall off as in the Brown-Henneaux boundary conditions (BH bc's) provided in Olof's answer.

However, it is not true that BH bc's are necessary for asymptotically $\textrm{AdS}_3$ behavior. You can obtain as asymptotic symmetry algebra (ASA) two copies of the Virasoro algebra even for weaker boundary conditions. The question of whether or not such boundary conditions are useful depends on the theory under consideration.

Permit me to given an example that I know quite well: In topologically massive gravity at a certain critical point one should allow logarithmic violations of the BH bc's in order to accommodate the full normalizable spectrum of linearized fluctuations around $\textrm{AdS}_3$ and to avoid the elimination of otherwise valid classical solutions. See http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0808.2575, in particular Eq. (8), which displays violations of the BH bc's in two entries of the metric. Nevertheless, one can show that one has two copies of the Virasoro algebra as ASA, and that the asymptotic charges are finite and conserved.

Quite generally, a reasonable strategy to find the "right" boundary conditions is to weaken them as much as possible, but without creating inconsistencies, like infinite or non-conserved charges. This can be sometimes a bit of an art and may require physical input.

• Thanks very much for the explanation. I find this definition very natural to me. I wonder if you know any reference that has mentioned this working definition? Thanks again! – Michael Shaw Jun 24 '11 at 14:04
• @Michael: You can have a look e.g. at section 3 of Kostas' lecture notes arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0209067. Eqs. (3.11) and (3.12) are similar to what I wrote in my answer, except that Kostas uses a non-constant lapse function and supposes a specific asymptotic expansion in (3.12) that has to be generalized for certain models (like topologically or generalized massive gravity). What he calls $g^{(0)}$ is what I called $\gamma^{(0)}$, and $r\sim e^{-\rho}$. [Note also that we both set to unity the AdS radius to reduce clutter.] – Daniel Grumiller Jun 29 '11 at 14:10

The BTZ black hole metric has a constant curvature, and hence the space is locally isometric to AdS$_3$. Moreover, the global space can be written as a quotient space of AdS$_3$ by a discrete group. However, I don't see a simple way of seeing this from the coordinated in the question.

That the space is asymptotically AdS$_3$ means that it satisfies the Brown-Henneaux boundary conditions. Change coordinates to $\rho = e^r$. Then the asymptotic metric in the question takes the form $$ds^2 = l^2 d\rho^2 + e^{2\rho}\left(-\frac{1}{l^2} dt^2 + d\phi^2\right) - J\,dt\,d\phi$$ The general Fefferman- Graham expansion takes the form $$ds^2 = l^2 d\rho^2 + \left(e^{2\rho} \gamma^{(0)}_{ij} + \rho \gamma^{(1)}_{ij} + \gamma^{(2)}_{ij} + \dotsb \right) dx^i dx^j$$ but for a metric satisfying the Brown-Henneaux boundary conditions the $\gamma^{(1)}$ term vanishes. This is enough to ensure that the asymptotic isometry algebra is the same as in AdS$_3$, namely that of two Virasoro algebras.

• While BTZ is indeed locally AdS$_3$ and is globally the quotient of AdS$_3$, I still find people saying that BTZ is asymptotically AdS$_3$. For example, in the review paper arXiv:gr-qc/9506079v1 by S. Carlip, you can find this statement in the introduction. Is it that the reason why BTZ is asymptotically AdS$_3$ cannot be seen simply from this coordinate, but we have to investigate the Penrose diagram instead? – Michael Shaw Jun 23 '11 at 7:58
• @Michael Sorry for the confused answer. After my edit it hopefully answers your actual question – Olof Jun 23 '11 at 9:15
• Thanks for your detailed reply. If the definition of "asymptotically AdS$_3$" is that it satisfies the Brown-Henneaux boundary condition, then we can directly claim this result since $g_{t\phi}=\mathcal{O}(1)$. However it seem weird to me that the definition of "asymptotically AdS$_3$" depends on the Brown-Henneaux boundary condition. Say, if I have another metric, how do I define the notion of "asymptotically this metric" in general? Or can it only be defined case by case? Moreover, the Brown-Henneaux BC is not unique for AdS$_3$ as is recently argued in this paper:arXiv:1007.1031. – Michael Shaw Jun 24 '11 at 2:40