1
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

Is the Lorentz Force acting on a wire, that has current $I$ in a magnetic field $B$ conservative? Or non-conservative? I understand that all the fundamental forces are conservative, am I correct?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by jinawee, DavePhD, Kyle Oman, Kyle Kanos, Brandon Enright May 21 '14 at 18:38

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

5
$\begingroup$

The Lorentz force $$ \vec F = \frac{d}{dt}\vec p_\text{charge} = q ( \vec E + \vec v \times \vec B ) $$ is in general not conservative, because it is possible to construct a system of two charges where the forces are not equal and opposite. Conservation of energy and momentum in electrodynamics requires you to also consider the energy and momenta associated with the fields.

Keep in mind that the Lorentz force on a moving charge $\vec F = q\vec v \times \vec B$, never does work. If magnetic field causes a current-carrying wire to accelerate, the energy comes from either the power supply controlling the magnetic field $\vec B$ or the power supply maintaining the current $\vec I$, and the work done must be computed using the induced electric field $\vec \nabla \times \vec E = -\partial \vec B / \partial t$. This is a very different creature from, say, a mass oscillating on a lossless spring, where the kinetic energy of the mass and the potential energy of the spring convert into one another.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ what about the case of a wire that carries a lot of current? $\endgroup$ – Pupil May 20 '14 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ An infinite, uniform wire in an infinite, uniform field will feel a constant force $\vec F = \vec I \times \vec B$. Compare to other constant forces. $\endgroup$ – rob May 20 '14 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ Why would it matter if it's constant or not? In comparison to a conservative force? So in any case where the Lorentz force is applied its always non-conservative? $\endgroup$ – Pupil May 20 '14 at 22:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Key Well, $\vec F = m\vec g$ near Earth's surface is a conservative, constant force. I suppose that if you had an infinite straight wire carrying in an infinite uniform field you could swing it on a pendulum. But the example seems quite contrived. I'm not sure it's a well-posed problem. $\endgroup$ – rob May 21 '14 at 15:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Key I think that you are right. $\endgroup$ – rob May 23 '14 at 13:04
1
$\begingroup$

Is the Lorentz Force acting on a wire, that has current I in a magnetic field B conservative? Or non-conservative?

As the wiki page you linked to explains, conservative force is a force that acts on particle and work done by this force when the particle moves from A to B does not depend on the path, just on the points A,B.

Wire is not particle, so the original meaning does not apply. If you want to use the word conservative for wire, you'll need to define what it means.

I understand that all the fundamental forces are conservative, am I correct?

Electrostatic and Newtonian gravitational forces are conservative. If the particles in the source of the force move, electric force will not be electrostatic and thus won't be conservative.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.