Translations and Noether's Theorem I'm fine with $U(1)$ symmetry and Noether's Theorem, but struggling with the translations of the field; namely
$$\phi'(x^{\mu})=\phi(x^{\mu}-a^{\mu}),$$  where $a^{\mu}$ constant four-vector
$$x^{\mu}=x^{\mu}+a^{\mu},$$
and the Lagrangian density
$${\cal L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi^*\partial^{\mu}\phi-V(\phi^*\phi).$$
So a few questions:


*

*I can't show the Lagrangian is invariant under this transformation. Is it just a case that as $a^{\mu}$ is constant then the first term in the Lagrangian will obviously stay the same? But what about $V$? How I can show that's invariant?

*Infinitesimally, is the transformation $\phi'(x^{\mu})=\phi(x^{\mu})-a^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi(x^{\mu})?$ 

*If I'm right in point 2., how can I apply Noether's Theorem to this?
 A: A translation by $x^\nu \to x^\nu - \epsilon^\nu$ corresponds to an infinitesimal transformation of the fields, by
$$\phi \to \phi + \epsilon^\nu \partial_\nu \phi$$
as we are performing an active rather than passive transformation. The Lagrangian transforms as,
$$\mathcal{L}\to \mathcal{L}+\epsilon^\nu \partial_\nu \mathcal{L}$$
by substituting $\phi$ into the Lagrangian. Notice the change is up to a total derivative, and hence Noether's theorem is applicable to the symmetry. The conserved current density is given by,
$$j^\mu = \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}X(\phi)-F^\mu(\phi)$$
where $X=\delta\phi$ and $F^\mu$ is such that $\partial_\mu F^\mu=\delta \mathcal{L}$ infinitesimally. For our case, we obtain the symmetric stress-energy tensor (analogous to that of general relativity),
$$T^\mu_\nu=\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial_\nu \phi - \delta^\mu_\nu \mathcal{L}$$
where the Kronecker delta is raised with the Minkowski metric. The current satisfies, $\partial_\mu T^{\mu}_\nu = 0$, and the corresponding Noether charge,
$$E=\int \mathrm{d}^3 x \, T^{00}$$
is the total energy of the system, whereas,
$$P^i = \int \mathrm{d}^3 x \, T^{0i}$$
is the $i$th component of the total momentum of the field, where $i=(x,y,z)$ only. A caveat: the stress-energy tensor derived by Noether's theorem is not always symmetric, and may require the addition of a term which satisfies the continuity equation, and ensures symmetry in the indices.

Alternate Method
Recall to obtain the Einstein field equations in general relativity, we may vary the Einstein-Hilbert action,
$$S\sim \int \mathrm{d}^4 x \, \sqrt{-g} \, \left( R + \mathcal{L}\right)$$
Similarly, in quantum field theory, we may promote our Minkowski metric to a generic metric tensor, thereby replacing the kinetic term of the Lagrangian with covariant derivatives. Up to some constants, the stress-energy tensor is given by
$$T^{\mu\nu} \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \frac{\partial (\sqrt{-g}\mathcal{L})}{\partial g^{\mu\nu}}$$
evaluated at $g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}$, which is precisely the definition we implement when obtaining the Einstein field equations for general relativity.
