0
$\begingroup$

I have been studying differential equations in RLC circuits: specifically I am looking at

a generator with fixed EMF $=E$,
a capacitor $C$,
an inductor with inductance $L$ and internal resistance $r$,
and a separate resistor $R$

with the elementary cases accounting for
$q$ (the charge on the capacitor),
$V_c$ its voltage or
$i$ the current flowing through the circuit

For example $$\ddot q+\frac{R+r}{L}\dot q+\frac{q}{LC}=E$$

I've been trying to find such a differential equation for the compound voltage

$$V_{L,r}=V_L +V_r=ri+L\frac{di}{dt}$$

which didn't seem to satisfy the criteria for a "regular ODE": $$\fbox{$\ddot V_{L,r}+\frac{R}{L}\dot V_{L,r}+\alpha V_{L,r}=\frac{\alpha r}{L}e^{-rt/L}\int e^{rt/L} \ V_{L,r} \ dt$}$$ with $\alpha=\frac{-Rr}{L^2}+\frac{1}{LC}$

I started with trying to express $i$ through $V_{L,r}$ as all relevant voltages are expressed in $i$ (resistor), $q$ (capacitor) and $\frac{di}{dt}$ ($V_{L,r}$). At first through this relation by applying regular ODE properties: $V_{L,r}=ri+L\frac{di}{dt} \rightarrow \fbox{$i=\frac{1}{L}e^{-rt/L} \int e^{rt/L} \ V_{L,r} \ dt$}$, and then replaced in : $E=V_{L,r}+Ri+\frac{q}{C} \rightarrow 0=\frac{dV_{L,r}}{dt}+R\frac{di}{dt}+\frac{i}{C}$ and obtained the aforementioned DE.

Should I be using any other physical relation?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Could you add a diagram showing the circuit - it's not clear whether you intend for all these components to be in series. $\endgroup$ – Floris Oct 3 '14 at 0:08
1
$\begingroup$

It is not clear to me why you want to do such a complicated thing. But if you want to follow this way, a slight easier approach is to resolve for the voltage $V_L$. The KVL for your circuit is $$\tag{1} E=V_L+(R+r)i+\frac{q}{C} $$ Now assuming zero initial conditions you have to express $i$ and $q$ in terms of $V_L$. The current $i$ is easily derived from the constitutive relation of the inductor: $$\tag{2} i(t)=\frac{1}{L}\int_0^{t}V_L(t')dt' $$ while for the (2) the charge $q(t)$ is $$\tag{3} q(t)=\int_0^{t}i(t')dt'=\frac{1}{L}\int_0^{t}dt'\int_0^{t}V_L(t'')dt'' $$ substituting (2) and (3) in (1) you have the equation

$$\tag{4} E=V_L+\frac{R+r}{L}\int_0^{t}V_L(t')dt'+\frac{1}{LC}\int_0^{t}dt'\int_0^{t}V_L(t'')dt'' $$

Differentiating (4) twice you get: $$ \tag{5} \ddot{V_L}+\frac{R+r}{L}\dot{V_L}+\frac{1}{LC}V_L=0 $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! Still, what led me consider this problem was that if I could obtain a DE for $V_{L,r}$ in a simple RL circuit ($V_{L,r}+\frac{L}{R+r} \frac{dV_{L,r}}{dt}=\frac{rE}{r+R}$, maybe I could obtain such a DE in a RLC one. $\endgroup$ – N.E. May 15 '14 at 6:06
  • $\begingroup$ @NizarEzroura - if you believe that this answered your question, please consider "accepting" by checking the little check mark. It is how you recognize the person who took the trouble to write a useful answer... $\endgroup$ – Floris Oct 3 '14 at 0:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.