3
$\begingroup$

Suppose you have a source of light that emits light with a wavelength of 2 meters, and you set the device to be turned on and switched off alternately. You also set it so that each interval the device is turned on is only long enough for 1 meter to be emitted (1/2 a wavelength). Do you ever observe any photons?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Do you ever observe any photons?

Yes, though probably not for the reason you think.

This is what the wave you're generating looks like. I've included a cosine wave for reference:

Your signal

So you are still generating a wave, but it has a different shape to a cosine wave. But any wave can be expressed as a sum of sines and cosines by expanding it as a Fourier series. So if we call your signal $S$ the expansion would be:

$$ S(\omega t) = a_0 + a_1\cos(\omega t) + a_2\cos(2\omega t) + a_3\cos(3\omega t) + ... $$

where the numbers $a_n$ are constants (actually the general expression is more complex that this but I've simplified it by assuming your signal is symmetric about $t = 0$). So you are actually transmitting a sum of waves with frequencies that are integer multiples of your base frequency $\omega$. In other words you are sending out a stream of photons with different energies.

I suspect your going in point is that a photon is a particle like a tiny billiard ball, and if you only transmit half a wave how can you be transmitted half a photon? The key thing to remember is that a photon is a quantum object so it is delocalised and doesn't have a well defined position. In effect the photons are spread out over the whole length of the beam of waves you're sending out, and there is no correlation between the position of the photon and the wavelength of the signal. In this case, where you're sending out a series of half waves, the photons are effectively composed of a sum of all the half waves.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ and do the magnitudes of the Fourier coefficients represent the probability that a photon of a particular frequency is going to be detected? $\endgroup$ – user120404 May 9 '14 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ The number of photons per second is proportional to $a_n^2$ and inversely proportional to $n$. This is because $a_n^2$ is the contribution each frequency of photon makes to the total energy, but the energy per photon is proportional to the wave frequency $n\omega$ and so the number of photons per unit energy is proportional to $1/n$. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie May 9 '14 at 15:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.