I have an exercise for Yang-Mills theory. I can't find answer anywhere.

Derive equations of motion for the Yang-Mills theory with the gauge group $SU(2)$ interacting with $SU(2)$ doublet of scalar fields.

I don't even know how to derive EOM for Lagrangian here. Any help? Or any source for appropriate handbook? (I've been using Maggiore, it doesn't have EOM for Yang-Mills here.)

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I have two questions - 1. Do you know of the Euler-Lagrange equations and how they are derived? 2. Do you know the Lagrangian of Yang-Mills theory coupled to scalars/fermions, etc? $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mitra May 7 '14 at 13:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 1. Yup, i know basis for classical field theory. 2. Nope. $\endgroup$ – Cheshire Cat May 7 '14 at 13:56

The Lagrangian of Yang-Mills theory coupled to scalars/fermions, etc. takes the form $$ {\cal L}_{YM} = - \frac{1}{2} \text{Tr} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + (D_\mu \phi) (D^\mu \phi)^* + i {\bar \psi} \gamma^\mu D_\mu \psi + \cdots $$ where the $\cdots$ represents other interactions terms that might be present. Let me explain the notation in the above expression.

  1. $\phi_i$ and $\psi_i$ are multiplets in some representation $R$ of the gauge group $G$. Here, $i = 1, \cdots, \dim R$

  2. The generators in representation $R$ are denoted as $T^a$. These are normalized to satisfy $$ [T^a, T^b] = i f^{ab}{}_c T^c,~~~~ \text{Tr} ( T^a T^b )= \frac{1}{2}\delta^{ab} $$ In other words, the $T_{ij}^a$'s are just some set of matrices satisfying the above properties.

  3. The covariant derivatives acting on the fields is \begin{align} (D_\mu \phi)_i &= \partial_\mu \phi_i - i g T^a_{ij} A_\mu^a \phi_j \\ (D_\mu \psi)_i &= \partial_\mu \psi_i - i g T^a_{ij} A_\mu^a \psi_j \\ \end{align} where $(A_\mu)_{ij} = A_\mu^a T_{ij}^a$.

  4. $$ F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu + g [A_\mu, A_\nu ] \\ $$ Explicitly $$ F_{\mu\nu}^a = \partial_\mu A^a_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu^a + i g f_{bc}{}^a A^b_\mu A_\nu^c $$

This completely specifies the Lagrangian of Yang Mills theory. You can now use the variational principle to determine the equations of motion.

  • $\begingroup$ Well ok, but i was expecting explicitely shown euquations of motion :) $\endgroup$ – Cheshire Cat May 7 '14 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @CheshireCat I doubt anybody will actually show you explicitly how to do this; it is too boring and tedious. But you should take the variation of the field as per usual, both the scalar/fermion field and the gauge fields, to get the E.O.M. $\endgroup$ – Hunter May 7 '14 at 19:03
  • $\begingroup$ @CheshireCat - If I gave you the equations of motion, then I would have solved the problem for you. $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mitra May 7 '14 at 19:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's why i wrote here, i want to see a solution for a problem :) I found something in S. Pokorski, "Gauge field theories", in 1.3 chapter. $\endgroup$ – Cheshire Cat May 7 '14 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ We don't give out solutions on this forum. See the description of the 'homework' tag for details. $\endgroup$ – Prahar Mitra May 7 '14 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.