3
$\begingroup$

All of the sources I have found for this online have been wildly unclear. Many use the phrase "Fermi energy" to refer to the "Fermi level" (which is emphatically not what I'm looking for; I want the Fermi energy as defined in this Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_energy ). Fermi energy is always greater than zero.

Has anyone ever measured the Fermi energy of graphene? Is there any way to calculate it from known quantities, such as the Fermi velocity, which is approx. $10^6$ m/s? i.e. is there a reason why the usual formula $E_F = \tfrac{1}{2}m_e v_F^2$ wouldn't work here? I read that the Fermi energy for undoped graphene is equal to the energy at the Dirac points, but I read elsewhere that that value is less than zero, which makes no sense because, again, Fermi energy is always greater than zero.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ My understanding is that the energy of holes/excitation is $\pm\hbar\nu|k|$. At 0K there are no populated excitations. So the Fermi energy is 0. As temperature increases, I believe that the Fermi energy goes a bit more negative, allowing for more excitations, but I don't have a justification. $\endgroup$ – bernie Nov 9 '15 at 2:38
  • $\begingroup$ $\pm \hbar \nu |k|$ is only correct for small k. It is not in general the energy dispersion of graphene. $\endgroup$ – Greg Petersen Feb 24 '16 at 14:58
1
$\begingroup$

You can find the band structure of graphene here: http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~phys123B/w2015/leggett-lecture.pdf Equation 9.

The minimum value for the energy is when both $\cos$ functions are 1 which gives an energy of $-3t$ which is the lowest occupied state. The highest occupied state is the Fermi level which in this case is $E_f = 0$. Thus the Fermi energy is $3t$.

The value of $t$ seems to be somewhere in the range of $2.5eV$ to $3eV$ (here with associated references) which would put the Fermi energy somewhere between $7.5eV$ to $9eV$.

I should point out that this value is not unique, but is by far the most commonly quoted result which stems from a tight-binding model that considers only nearest-neighbor interactions. You can also consider second nearest-neighbor interactions as well as many others (e.g. spin-orbit) which will change the result slightly.

Finally, I would add we are just considering the $\pi$ band and aren't considering any of the more tightly bound orbitals that come from the interplane bonding (the sp2 orbitals). I used to know the calculation for these energy levels as well but I seem to have misplaced my notes on the subject. Finding this energy would give you the most correct value of the Fermi energy, but since these states are rarely accessed they are typically ignored.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.