2
$\begingroup$

The following wikipedia articles are incompatible :

According to both articles, the equation describing the path of a photon in a Schwarzschild metric is :

$$\frac{d\varphi}{dr} = \frac{1}{r^2\sqrt{\frac{1}{b^2}-\left(1-\frac{r_s}{r}\right)\frac{1}{r^2}}}$$

with :

  • $\varphi$ the deviation angle
  • $r$ the distance between the photon and the mass
  • $r_s$ the Schwarzschild radius

and $b$ which is the distance of closest approach in the first article and the impact parameter in the second one.

So I have two questions :

  1. Which one is correct? (What is $b$?)

  2. If $b$ is the impact parameter, what is the formula of the distance of closest approach $r_0$ as a function of $b$ (or inversely, the impact parameter $b$ as a function of $r_0$)?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have seen $b$ defined as $L/E$ where $L$ is the angular momentum and $E$ is the energy. e.g. p.188 in Introduction to Black Hole Physics by Frolov. How does this make sense for a photon? Why does the impact parameter, essentially a function of the trajectory, depend on the angular momentum or the energy when the equations of motion don't depend on these things? $\endgroup$ – supercoolphysicist Nov 12 '17 at 9:49
2
$\begingroup$

The relationship between $b$ and $r_0$ for the Schwarzschild metric is:

$$ b = \frac{r_0}{\sqrt{1 - \tfrac{r_s}{r0}}} $$

where $r_s$ is the radius of the event horizon. See this paper for the gory details.

The equations given in the two articles are derived in the weak field limit i.e. $r \gg r_s$ so $b \approx r_0$ anyway and it doesn't make any real difference which you use. If I were writing the article I would describe $b$ as the impact parameter and not the distance of closest approach, but I don't feel strongly enough about it to want to edit the offending Wikipedia article.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $b$ is certainly the impact parameter. As you mention, in the relevant limit $b\approx r_0$ and hence I would say it's probably OK for the wikipedia article that's wrong to state that "the length-scale b can be interpreted as the distance of closest approach", which is already worded somewhat carefully. $\endgroup$ – Danu May 2 '14 at 7:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.