3
$\begingroup$

I have a question about the spinor helicity formalism from arXiv:1308.1697

Denote the massless spin-1/2 fermions as Eqs. (2.10)-(2.11) in that paper $$v_+(p)= \begin{pmatrix} |p]_a \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ $$v_-(p)= \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ |p \rangle^{\dot{a}} \end{pmatrix} $$ $$\bar{u}_-(p)= (0, \langle p |_{\dot{a}})$$ $$\bar{u}_+(p)= ([p |^{a},0)$$ For real momenta, there is an identity in that paper $$ [k| \gamma^{\mu} |p \rangle^*= [p|\gamma^{\mu}|k \rangle \tag{2.33}$$

My question is, how to prove (2.33)? I know $$[p|^a=(|p \rangle^{\cdot{a}})^*, \langle p |_{\dot{a}} = (|p]_a)^* \tag{2.14}$$ for real momenta.

By using (2.14) I got $$[k| \gamma^{\mu} |p \rangle = ([p|)^* | \gamma^{\mu} (|k \rangle)^* $$, since $\gamma^{\mu*} \neq \gamma^{\mu}, \mu=2$, I still miss a complex conjugation...

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The problem is sloppy (but convenient) notation. The objects, \begin{equation} \left| k \right] ^a , \quad \left| p \right\rangle ^{ \dot{a} } \end{equation}
are two component spinors while $ \gamma_\mu$ is a 4x4 matrix. So its not even clear what the brakets mean. When we write the braket, \begin{equation} \left[ k | \gamma ^\mu | p \right\rangle \end{equation} what we really mean is that we pick out the Pauli matrix in the $ \gamma ^\mu $ with the correct index structure. For example, \begin{equation} \left[ k \right| ^a \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & \sigma ^\mu _{ a \dot{a} } \\ \bar{\sigma} ^\mu _{ \dot{a} a } & 0 \end{array} \right) \left| p \right\rangle^ {\dot{a}} = \left[ k \right| ^a \sigma ^{ \mu } _{ a \dot{a} } \left| p \right\rangle ^{ \dot{a} } \end{equation} with similar results for the other brakets.

Now getting back to your question. The $ \gamma ^\mu $ matrix is not invariant under complex conjugation: \begin{equation} \left( \gamma ^\mu \right) ^\dagger = \gamma _0 \gamma ^\mu \gamma _0 = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & \bar{\sigma} ^\mu \\ \sigma ^\mu & 0 \end{array} \right) \end{equation} so all complex conjugation does is switch the positions of the $ \sigma ^\mu $ and $ \bar{\sigma} ^\mu $ matrices. Therefore, we can just omit the complex conjugation if we remember the ``pick Pauli matrix with the correct index structure'' prescription.

Then we have, \begin{equation} \left( \left[ k \right| ^a ( \gamma ^\mu ) _{ a \dot{a} } \left| p \right\rangle ^{ \dot{a} } \right) ^\ast = \left[ p \right| \gamma ^\mu \left| k \right\rangle \end{equation} where it is understood that now we are picking out the $ \bar{\sigma} ^\mu $ matrix instead of $ \sigma ^\mu $ in $ \gamma ^\mu $.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.