3
$\begingroup$

We can combine colored light, creating other colors, at least in terms of visual perception.

But how it the result physically "a different color" - if it is at all?

Or is all this not a physical question to begin with - but only about our eye and brain?



To have an example, we

  • have an incandescent bulb, showing "white" light, and
  • combine red, green and blue light in intensities such that it looks roughly the same.

It is not central to the question whether it is exactly matching the white light - but certainly interesting to understan whether it could perfectly match, and why.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The question seems to look at it from a different perspective, but yes, the answer does fit pretty well, it seems. Very interesting! $\endgroup$ – Volker Siegel Apr 17 '14 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ To sum up the answer from the duplicate link, when you "combine" colors, they don't actually mix together to create new wavelengths, but rather it's the eye and the brain which is being tricked to think there is a new color involved. The eyes are actually pretty bad at assessing things like spectral width and spectral content, simply because they operate by a 3-channel detection method where each channel is basically like a vacuum that sucks up light in a ~150nm range without distinguishing between the spectral content within that range. The example of "yellow" in the link is helpful. $\endgroup$ – DumpsterDoofus Apr 17 '14 at 12:35
2
$\begingroup$

A "normal, healthy" human eye has two types of light-sensitive cells in the retina: rods ("color blind", but capable of sensing low light levels) and cones: cells that are sensitive to different bands. See this figure for their relative sensitivity (from http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/colcon.html)

enter image description here

When you look at a spectrum of light, you can think of the eye's response as the result of the integral of $\int{I(\lambda)* sensitivity(\lambda)*d\lambda}$ for each of the three types of cones. It should be immediately obvious that different spectra (i.e. different "colors") can be perceived as being "the same" because of this way of processing the light. It gets further complicated because some people may be missing one or more types of cones ("color blind") so their perception of some colors may be different altogether.

The above is the reason that making "good white light" is hard. If you start with a bright (hot) incandescent source, you will be illuminating an object with every wavelength in the visible spectrum; but fluorescent lights (and LEDs) tend to create light in "bands". Thus, your perception of some colors will be different depending on the light source used. This is usually reflected in something called the "color rendering index" of the light source - where "100" represents perfect rendering, and lower numbers are indicative of a "lumpy" spectrum. The eye might still see this as "white" (because the source light excites the three types of cones evenly), but other "colors" may not show up very well since they do not in fact get illuminated.

An example of the different spectra is given at http://www.ledsmagazine.com/content/dam/leds/migrated/objects/features/10/2/11/Avnet_Fig2T_22513.jpg

enter image description here

You can see that a typical incandescent lamp is biased towards red (because the filament is not as hot as the sun - this is why digital cameras do "white balance correction" and they usually have a "tungsten filament" setting). By contrast, a fluorescent lamp tends to have several distinct peaks in the emission spectrum - these are the emission peaks of the phosphors used to convert the UV light emitted in the gas of the tube into visible light. Finally, modern white LED technology is reaching a point where quite a wide range of excitation wavelengths are present, leading to higher color rendering fidelity.

Looking at the spectrum of the fluorescent tube above, if you had an object that was "black" except for a reflection in a narrow band at 570 nm, it would look black with such a source, when it ought to look orange. Yet if the same object was reflective at 545 nm (the emission peak), it would look bright green. An object that was a mix of "colors" in that narrow range would look very different in fluorescent light than in sunlight.

So the answer to your question is really - it's in the eye, not the brain.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Now I understand why there are so many ways to build a good white fluorescent or LED lamp. There is no perfect combination of "phosphors" - you can start with what you have at had, and optimize for getting these three relative amounts right, with phosphors that you can work with. $\endgroup$ – Volker Siegel Apr 17 '14 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ @VolkerSiegel - you are right. I know people who have made a life's work out of "finding the right mix". The combination of physics, chemistry and materials science required is fascinating. $\endgroup$ – Floris Apr 17 '14 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ Hehe, after trying a few times to find a good "white" lamp, many years ago, I gave up, and decided to only retry every five years or so... and now it's time - looks better, this time :) $\endgroup$ – Volker Siegel Apr 17 '14 at 13:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For the technical perspective on LED spectra, see over at electronics.SE: LED lighting with incandescent spectrum? $\endgroup$ – Volker Siegel Apr 17 '14 at 13:32
1
$\begingroup$

The cells in our retina that detect by frequency (read: colour) detect most strongly in three slightly different bands we know as Red, Green and Blue.

To make a slight correction I would say an incadescent bulb is quite far from white, so I would rather proceed talking about sunlight on a clear day. The reason why sunlight appears as white as say a white flashlight made of RGB LEDs is because light from both sources stimulate all your RGB retinal cells similarly and more importantly in similar proportion.

To put into perspective, an incandescent bulb is very similar to sunlight in the RGB distribution by proportion (see blackbody curve), except that there is heavier contribution in the frequencies we associate with the color Red. Candle light is similar.

Daylight fluorescents are much more white, but upon closer inspection, these actually produce more Blue in comparison to R/G. Another thing to note with non blackbody light sources like these is that they cheat by having almost no light output in frequencies other than R G or B. Your eyes can't tell the difference because all RGB cells are stimulated, which is exactly what happens when natural light hits those cells.

None of these lights would look the same to a honey bee, which have 4 types of cone cells in their eyes. That extra cell dedicated to UV could very well be what allows a bee to very easily distinguish sunlight from reconstituted RGB light coming from LED flashlights.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

In my answer to this question: (What is the sun's spectral series?), I give a very detailed answer about why mixing colours of light produces other colours and how it is purely a result of biology and evolution. I also delve a bit into the structure of the human eye and why, in fact, only three colours are necessary to reproduce all of the colours we can see. It touches on much of what Floris has written, but it has more pictures and is written slightly more for a layman explanation.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.