9
$\begingroup$

I read several textbooks of QFT and found that there are two kinds of definition of $S$ operator (or S matrix).

  • First kind:

    Define $\hat{S}$ is map from out space to in space $$\hat{S}\left|\beta,\text{out}\right\rangle:=\left|\beta,\text{in}\right\rangle,$$ so that $$S_{\beta\alpha}:= \left \langle \beta,\text{out} | \alpha,\text{in}\right\rangle= \left \langle \beta,\text{out} \middle |\hat{S}\middle | \alpha,\text{out}\right\rangle= \left \langle \beta,\text{in}\middle |\hat{S}\middle | \alpha,\text{in}\right\rangle.$$ I understand that all these vectors are defined in the Heisenberg picture.

  • Second definition: $$S_{\beta\alpha}:={}_I \left \langle \beta \middle |\hat{S}\middle | \alpha \right\rangle_I$$ where subscript $_I$ means vector are in interacting picture. In this definition, then, $$\hat{S}=U_I(+\infty,-\infty),$$ where $U_I(+\infty,-\infty)$ is the evolution operator in interacting picture.

Are these two definitions equivalent? I am confused about it.

Remark: I konw that the matrix element $S_{\beta\alpha}$ is the same in these two pictures, what I want to ask is whether the operator $\hat{S}$ is same in these two definitions. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

I don't completely understand the two sets of statements you've written, but I think I understand the essence of your question. Maybe this helps:


The S-matrix (operator) is a transfer function from in states to out states.

  1. If your states are not evolving (Heisenberg/Interaction picture) then you need to insert an evolution operator between the states.

  2. If your states are in the Schrodinger picture and they're evolving with time, then $ | out, t = \infty \rangle = (\textrm{evolution operator}) \; | out , t = 0 \rangle $

So the definition (convention) for the S-matrix depends on your convention for defining the Hilbert space at late times (whether it is the same Hilbert space as initial times, or if it is the time-evolved Hilbert space). This is equivalent to whether you're in the Schrodinger or the Heisenberg picture. Physically, I hope it's now clear why both descriptions/conventions are the same object.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.