How clean will first generation fusion reactors be compared to fission reactors? Googling the topic seems to indicate that fusion reactors will produce less waste and less toxic radioactivity, but this fact never seems to be mentioned during the current debate over nuclear power.  Will fusion reactors be cleaner than fission reactors?  If so, how much cleaner?
 A: Here they say that there is no waste per se only that some parts can become contaminated and they'll refurbish them onsite. The rest will be handed over to the authorities.
https://www.iter.org/mach/hotcell

The Hot Cell Facility will be necessary at ITER to provide a secure
  environment for the processing, repair or refurbishment, testing, and
  disposal of components that have become activated by neutron exposure.
  Although no radioactive products are produced by the fusion reaction
  itself, energetic neutrons interacting with the walls of the vacuum
  vessel will 'activate' these materials over time. Also, materials can
  become contaminated by beryllium and tungsten dust, and tritium.

This one is about how much fuel is needed for the reaction(s). Based on how little is being used you could deduce on how little waste is being produced.
https://www.iter.org/sci/fusionfuels

In fact, a fusion reaction is about four million times more energetic
  than a chemical reaction such as the burning of coal, oil or gas.
  While a 1,000 MW coal-fired power plant requires 2.7 million tons of
  coal per year, a fusion plant of the kind envisioned for the second
  half of this century will only require 250 kilos of fuel per year,
  half of it deuterium, half of it tritium.
In addition, fusion emits no pollution or greenhouse gases. Its major
  by-product is helium: an inert, non-toxic gas. There is no possibility
  of a "runaway" reaction because the conditions for fusion are
  precise—any alteration in these conditions and the plasma cools within
  seconds and the reaction stops. Fusion has the capacity to furnish
  large-scale quantities of energy, with a low burden of waste for
  future generations.

Also a relevant link posted by anna_v in a comment is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER#Responses_to_criticism

Proponents believe that much of the ITER criticism is misleading and
  inaccurate, in particular the allegations of the experiment's
  "inherent danger." The stated goals for a commercial fusion power
  station design are that the amount of radioactive waste produced
  should be hundreds of times less than that of a fission reactor, and
  that it should produce no long-lived radioactive waste, and that it is
  impossible for any such reactor to undergo a large-scale runaway chain
  reaction.

A: That's right. I'm really out of the loop regarding nuclear fusion shielding so feel free to correct me, but the only radioactive waste will be the reactor's inner walls (because of the radiation). The only other 'waste' that a fusion reactor produces is helium.
