Free-fall time for two objects on a radial path (starting from rest) is given by:

$t(y)=\sqrt\frac{y_0^3}{2u}\biggl(\sqrt{\frac{y} {y_0} \bigl({1} -\frac{y}{y_0}}\bigr) + \arccos\sqrt\frac{y}{y_0}\biggr)$


$t$ is the time after the start of the fall

$y$ is the distance between the centers of the bodies

$y_0$ is the initial value of $y$

$u$ = $G(m_1 + m_2$) is the standard gravitational parameter.

The solution of this equation of motion yields time as a function of separation. See also this Phys.SE and links therein.

Question: Now let's say these objects start with some initial velocity. How would you incorporate some initial $v$ into these calculations?

  • $\begingroup$ Try starting with the derivation given here and add a $\dot r = ...$ at the appropriate point. $\endgroup$ Mar 21, 2014 at 14:25

1 Answer 1


This is only a partial answer but for gravitationally bound objects, i.e. the kinetic + potential energy < 0, you can simply use the equation you already have.

If you start at a distance $y$ with velocity $u$ simply find the distance $y'$ where the velocity would be zero:

$$ \frac{GM}{y_0^2} - \frac{GM}{y'^2} = \tfrac{1}{2}m u^2 $$

Then use this value of $y_0$ in the equation you already have.


You'll need to substitute this expression in the equation you already have and replace $t$ by $t + t(y_0)$ so that $t = 0$ at your desired starting position. I haven't attempted this because while straightforward it produces a messy and unilluminating equation.

For gravitationally unbound objects I guess you could use the equation for a hyperbolic orbit and take the limit of the angular momentum equal to zero. I did a quick Google but couldn't find a closed form expression for a hyperbolic orbit, so I suspect it's not pretty.

I suspect the reason for the lack of response to your question is that it's not a terribly exciting one. The differential equation that controls the equation of motion is a very simple one:

$$ \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} = \frac{GM}{y^2} $$

but as you've already found even simple differential equations can have cumbersome analytical solutions. Solving the equation for the initial conditions $v(0) <> 0$ isn't physically very enlightning and is algebraically tedious.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.