3
$\begingroup$

This should be a trivial calculation but somehow I have managed to get myself confused about this.

The grand partition function is:

$\mathcal Z = \sum_{N=1}^\infty \sum_{r(N)} {\text e}^{-\beta E_r +\beta N \mu}$

And the average number of particles:

$\left \langle N \right \rangle = \frac{1}{\mathcal Z} \sum_{N} \sum_{r(N)} N{\text e}^{-\beta E_r + \beta N \mu } = \frac{1}{\beta} \frac{\partial}{\partial \mu} \ln \mathcal Z$

How can I take the derivative of that by the chemical potential? I thought about taking the inverse of the derivative of the chemical potential by the number of particles by I suspect that I'll be in the same position.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\mu^2} \ln \mathcal Z$? $\endgroup$
    – dbrane
    May 24, 2011 at 14:32
  • $\begingroup$ Now try and actually calculate that derivative, I couldn't convince myself it is not 0 $\endgroup$
    – Yotam
    May 24, 2011 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ $\langle N \rangle$ is some analytical function of the parameters of the ensemble, in this case $\beta$ and $\mu$; only if $\langle N \rangle$ didn't depend on $\mu$, the derivative would be zero. $\endgroup$
    – Gerben
    May 24, 2011 at 21:15
  • $\begingroup$ You should've mentioned in your question that you wanted to show that it is not zero. See my answer below. $\endgroup$
    – dbrane
    May 24, 2011 at 21:42

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

We want to find $$\frac{\partial\langle N\rangle}{\partial\mu}=\frac{1}{\beta} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \mu^2} \ln \mathcal Z=\left(\frac{\mathcal Z'}{\beta \mathcal Z}\right)'=\left(\frac{-\mathcal Z'^2}{\beta \mathcal Z^2}+\frac{\mathcal Z''}{\beta \mathcal Z}\right)$$ where the prime denotes differentiation w.r.t. $\mu$. In order for this to be zero we must have $$\mathcal Z\mathcal Z''=\mathcal Z'^2$$ which written out in full is $$\sum_{NN'rr'}{\text e}^{-\beta (E_r+E_{r'}) +\beta (N+N') \mu}\beta^2N^2=\sum_{NN'rr'}{\text e}^{-\beta (E_r+E_{r'}) +\beta (N+N') \mu}\beta^2NN'$$ where the summation on both sides is now over $N'$ and $r'$ as well. This requires $N=N'$, which clearly doesn't hold always - this is the same as saying that the square of a sum is not equal to the sum of squares. Therefore, $\frac{\partial\langle N\rangle}{\partial\mu}$ is not zero at finite temperature. You would expect this since $\frac{\partial\langle N\rangle}{\partial\mu}$ is proportional to the variance of the number of particles $\langle (\delta N)^2 \rangle$.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.