-1
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

If the universe is constantly expanding faster than the speed of light, how could Einstein be right?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Kyle Kanos, Brandon Enright, John Rennie, Qmechanic Mar 12 '14 at 10:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Relevant: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Universal_expansion $\endgroup$ – BMS Mar 11 '14 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/26549/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Mar 11 '14 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ @BMS, that Wikipedia article is incorrect. If you computed the separation velocity of objects moving with the Hubble flow as comoving distance over cosmological time, you would get zero. That's the whole point of comoving coordinates. FTL recession velocity is what you compute if you take proper distance over cosmological time. $\endgroup$ – user27578 Mar 11 '14 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ The universe isn't constantly expanding. It's accelerating... discovered in 1998. $\endgroup$ – Schrödinger's Cat Mar 12 '14 at 5:53
  • $\begingroup$ Define "nothing" here.. Einstein never said nothing. $\endgroup$ – Schrödinger's Cat Mar 12 '14 at 6:12
3
$\begingroup$

In SR, there are global inertial reference frames and, in this context,

no object moving with speed less than c in one reference frame moves with speed equal to or greater than c in any reference frame.

But, in GR, in a curved spacetime,

there are no global inertial reference frames.

Instead, there are local inertial reference frames. We say that, tangent to each event in spacetime is a flat spacetime, i.e., in the infinitesimal neighborhood of an event, spacetime is flat to first order.

So, in this tangent spacetime, SR holds.

But, we must be much more careful in a general spacetime as in, for example, a universe undergoing a metric expansion of space.

In such a spacetime, the very notion of distance and relative speed is far more subtle and complex than in the flat spacetime of SR. In fact, there are multiple notions of distance and relative speed that must be 'grokked' to sort all of this out.

From the Wikipedia article linked above:

Because this expansion is caused by relative changes in the distance-defining metric, this expansion (and the resultant movement apart of objects) is not restricted by the speed of light upper bound of special relativity which is a constraint only on the speed matter can obtain from boosts from one reference frame to another. Two references frames that are globally separated can be moving apart faster than light without violating special relativity, though whenever two reference frames diverge from each other faster than the speed of light, there will be observable effects associated with such situations including the existence of various cosmological horizons.

In other words, one must be very careful in translating results from the flat spacetime of SR to the curved spacetime of GR.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

A better way to think of it would be that space is being added to the universe; the universe is not "moving".

Consider the case of two stars. The expansion of the universe doesn't cause the stars to "move" away from each other. Rather, space is created between the stars, resulting in them being further apart.

This consequently, doesn't violate general relativity.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is wrong notion. By this theory, you can exactly pin-point the region in Universe where Big Bang happened. Remember, Big Bang happened everywhere.. At every point of the Space. So, there's no new space. The extra space you get is old and was part of Big Bang seed. $\endgroup$ – Schrödinger's Cat Mar 12 '14 at 5:57
1
$\begingroup$

In Special Theory of Relativity, all inertial reference frames are able to communicate with each other to share their results. And, they all agree with the value of c and related conclusions.

In General Theory of Relativity, it's not always true. There are situations when two inertial reference frames may not be able to communicate with each other. In such situations, Einstein's Relativity is no longer valid as we have no way to compare results of both reference frames.

When it comes to universe's expansion (which is actually expansion of Spacetime) and we calculate speed of a point on one edge of universe with respect to a point on opposite edge of the universe, we actually cheat. We aren't allowed for such calculations as per General Theory of Relativity. Both points are separated in such a way that reference frames attached to them can't communicate with each other. That's it.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.