6
$\begingroup$

In Peskin and Schroeder on pg. 304, the authors call the fermionic path integral: \begin{equation} \int {\cal D} \bar{\psi} {\cal D} \psi \exp \left[ i \int \,d^4x \bar{\psi} ( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m ) \psi \right] \end{equation} a functional determinant, \begin{equation} \det \left( i \gamma_\mu D^\mu - m \right). \end{equation} I've never heard this way of thinking about it. Why would the generating functional be a functional determinant?

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

This is because the path integral ${\cal Z}$ is an infinite-dimensional version of a Grassmann-odd Gaussian integral

$$\int \!\mathrm{d}^n \bar{\theta} ~\mathrm{d}^n\theta ~e^{\sum_{i,j=1}^n\bar{\theta}_i ~M^i{}_j ~\theta^j}~\propto~\det(M), $$

where the indices $i,j$ can be interpreted as DeWitt's condensed notation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Just to add to @Qmechanic's perfect answer. You can also see the discussion in the appendix of Ramond's QFT book. It is also interesting that the integral for real Grassmann variables gives the Pfaffian. $\endgroup$ – suresh Mar 4 '14 at 2:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.