2
$\begingroup$

(Rest) mass of proton = (rest) mass of neutron (approximately) = $1.67 \times 10^{-27}$ kg.

let $m$ be the mass of nitrogen atom then $m = 2.32 \times 10^{-26}$ kg.

$c = 3 \times 10^8$ m/s (approx).

Energy $E = mc^2$.

$E = 2.32 \times 10^{-26} \times 3 \times 10^8 \times 3 \times 10^8$ Joules.

$E = 20.88 \times 10^{-26+16}$ Joules.

$E = 20.88 \times 10^{-10}$ Joules.

Energy required to propel a nitrogen atom at the speed of light is very less. Is my calculation wrong?

Because even if we take a cluster of 10000 atoms of nitrogen we can make them cross the speed of light easily.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I fixed your formatting, but I'm not really sure what you're asking. $\endgroup$ – Nathaniel Mar 1 '14 at 9:58
  • $\begingroup$ i am saying that if clusters of atoms can go faster than speed of light doesn't this disprove the theory? $\endgroup$ – Scramjet Mar 1 '14 at 10:02
  • $\begingroup$ This question (v3) seems spurred by a confusion between rest/invariant mass and relativistic mass. See e.g. this Phys.SE post, and a couple of paragraphs down on this Wikipedia page. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Mar 1 '14 at 10:55
6
$\begingroup$
  1. The mass $m$ in the formula is NOT the rest mass $m_0$ and therefore dependent on the velocity: $$ m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \equiv \gamma m_0 $$ This means you cannot simply take the normal mass of a nitrogen atom and put it in there, if you assume a speed $v \neq 0$.

  2. The $c$ in the formula doesn't mean that the particle travels at light speed. It's a factor, nothing more. The actual particle velocity comes into play by the mass $m$ with the above relation. There is also an expression for the energy in terms of the rest mass and momentum: $$ E^2 = p^2c^2 + m_0^2c^4 $$ This might remind you of Pythagoras ;) In fact this equation is even better because it's also valid for massless particles like the photon, where $E = mc^2$ is only valid for massive objects.

  3. You can easily see with the help of the first equation that if $v$ approaches $c$ the term for $m$ becomes $\infty$ and therefore $E$ becomes also $\infty$. This means that it's impossible to accelerate a particel with a rest mass $m_0 \neq 0$ to light speed.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why don't they teach such interesting stuff in school? $\endgroup$ – Scramjet Jun 25 '15 at 17:49
6
$\begingroup$

Your calculation is wrong because $E=mc^2$ doesn't mean that the object has velocity $c$.
To make my answer useful i will give a very brief overview of Dynamics at higher velocities which is a consequence of Special theory of relativity.
At higher speeds(of order of $c$) Newtonian mechanics is not valid.
The linear momentum is defined as: $$\vec p=m_0\gamma \vec v \tag{1}$$
$m_0$ is the rest mass which appears in Newton's second law. $\gamma$ is defined as: $\gamma= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}$.
Newton's second law in the modified form is$$\vec F=\dfrac{d\vec p}{dt}$$ where $\vec p$ is as defined in equation $1$.
Now for increasing velocity of a material particle from $0$ to $c$ we have to apply some force but as long as we apply the force the moving mass $m_0\gamma$ increase boundlessly making it impossible for a finite force applied for a finite time to make $v=c$.
Let us apply a constant Force $F$ on a material object for time $t$ and see if we can make $v=c$ or not.
Let the particle starts from rest so $\vec F$ and $\vec v$ are in same direction. So we can right: $$F=\dfrac{dp}{dt}$$
In differential form
$$\lim_{dp \to 0}dp=F\lim_{dt \to 0}dt$$
Intagrating within proper limits, given $F$ is constant throughout
$$\int_0^pdp=F\int_0^tdt$$
$$\implies p=Ft$$
Using equation $1$ with a little algebra
$$v=\dfrac{Ftc}{\sqrt{m_0^2c^2+F^2t^2}}$$
However large $t$ may become, $v$ can never reach $c$ or exceed $c$.
About $E=mc^2$. It means Total Kinetic energy of a particle moving at a speed $v$ is given by: $$E=m_0\gamma c^2$$
An important conclusion can be made from the above written equation. Any material object if is at rest in certain co-ordinate system its kinetic energy is $m_0c^2$ where $m_0$ is the rest mass which appears in the usual classical equation of Newton's second law $\vec F=m_0 \vec a$. It also means that mass is equivalent to energy, that is you can convert this mass into pure energy like heat.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.