4
$\begingroup$

I'm wondering about the Faddeev-Popov method described in Peskin Schroeder and also on page 7 in this link.

What gives them the right to simply add the Gaussian $\omega$ and thus introduce the $\xi$ parameter? It seems so arbitrary to me.

Are there any rigorous derivation of the Faddeev-Popov method?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Minor comment to the post (v4): Please consider to mention explicitly author, title, etc. of link, so it is possible to reconstruct link in case of link rot. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Mar 1, 2014 at 17:02

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You are always allowed to introduce a new integration variable as long as its not its already being summed over. This might be more clear in discrete form: \begin{align} \int d x \, f (x) & \rightarrow \Delta x\sum _i \,f ( x _i ) \\ & = \big( N \Delta y\sum _j g ( y _j ) \big) \Delta x \sum _i f ( x _i ) \\ \end{align} where $ N \Delta y\sum _j g ( y _j ) = 1 $ (note that it is very important this doesn't depend on $x$). Then, \begin{align} \int d x \, f (x)& \rightarrow N \Delta x \Delta y \sum _{i,j} f ( x _i ) g ( y _j ) \end{align}
The only difference with the Fadeev Poppov procedure is that now $ g ( y ) $ is also a function of a new unphysical parameter,$\xi$. In order to not change the value of the integral over $ f (x) $, the constant $ N $ needs to also change with $ \xi $.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You make sense, PS didn't. $\endgroup$ Mar 13, 2014 at 9:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.