One of the most common gauges in QED computations are the $R_{\xi}$ gauges obtained by adding a term \begin{equation} -\frac{(\partial_\mu A^{\mu})^2}{2\xi} \end{equation} to the Lagrangian. Different choices of $\xi$ correspond to different gauges ($\xi=0$ is Landau, $\xi=1$ is Feynman etc.) The propagator for the gauge field is different depending on the choice of gauge. The choice of Landau gauge forces $\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$, but I have never seen a similiar statement for the other gauges. I would like to know what constraint on the gauge field is produced by the other covariant gauges. For instance, what is the constraint on $A_\mu$ when $\xi=1,2,3,...$ etc. Is it still $\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$ or something different (it seems like it should be different)?

  • $\begingroup$ In Euclidean signature, you can regard the $R_{\xi}$ gauge fix term as a Gaussian distribution of $\partial_\mu A^\mu$, with zero mean and $\xi$ variance. Landau gauge $\xi=0$ corresponds to zero variance, i.e. $\partial_\mu A^\mu = 0$ with $100\%$ possibility. $\endgroup$
    – MadMax
    Feb 18, 2020 at 15:55

1 Answer 1


I) The un-gauge-fixed QED Lagrangian density reads

$$ {\cal L}_0~:=~-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu} -m)\psi.\tag{1}$$ The gauge-fixed QED Lagrangian density in the $R_{\xi}$-gauge reads

$$ {\cal L}~=~ {\cal L}_0 +{\cal L}_{FP}-\frac{1}{2\xi}\chi^2 , \tag{2}$$

where the Faddeev-Popov term is

$$ {\cal L}_{FP}~=~ -d_{\mu}\bar{c}~d^{\mu}c, \tag{3}$$


$$ \chi~:=~d_{\mu}A^{\mu}~\approx~0 \tag{4}$$

is the Lorenz gauge-fixing condition.

II) In the path integral with $R_{\xi}$-gauge-fixing, the Lorenz gauge-fixing condition (4) is only imposed in a quantum average sense. In general the Lorenz gauge-fixing condition may be violated by quantum fluctuations, except in the Landau gauge $\xi=0^+$, where such quantum fluctuations are exponentially suppressed (in the Wick-rotated Euclidean path integral).

III) If we introduce a Lautrup-Nakanishi auxiliary field $B$, the QED Lagrangian density in the $R_{\xi}$-gauge reads

$$ {\cal L}~=~ {\cal L}_0 +{\cal \cal L}_{FP} +\frac{\xi}{2}B^2+B\chi \quad\stackrel{\text{int. out } B}{\longrightarrow}\quad {\cal L}_0 +{\cal L}_{FP}-\frac{1}{2\xi}\chi^2 ,\tag{5} $$

cf. this related Phys.SE post. The Euler-Lagrange equation for the $B$-field reads

$$ -\xi B~\approx~\chi.\tag{6}$$

Since there are no in- and out-going external $B$-particles, one may argue that the $B$-field is classically zero, and therefore that the Lorenz condition $\chi\approx 0$ is classically imposed, cf. eq. (6), independently of the value of the gauge parameter $\xi$. Quantum mechanically for $\xi>0$, the eq. (4) does only hold in average, as explained above.

  • $\begingroup$ Note added: The Lorenz function $\chi$ and the $B$-field are invariant under Wick rotation. To make the Gaussian integration over $B$ convergent, we should choose $B$ to be imaginary. But then the Euler-Lagrange eq. (6) equates something real to something imaginary, which is rubbish, except if they are both zero. In other words, solutions to the eq. (6) should be taken with a grain of salt. Nevertheless, the Gaussian integral representation remains valid even if the stationary point is complex. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Mar 1, 2014 at 20:34
  • $\begingroup$ So what you are saying is that $\chi\approx 0$ no matter which gauge paramater $\xi$ is chosen, as long as it is positive. I still don't get what would be the Euler-Lagrange equation if $\xi\to0$ though.. $\endgroup$
    – PPR
    Oct 5, 2014 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ Note added: In the Minkowski signature, assuming that complex conjugation reverse the factors of supernumbers, we see that $c$ ($\bar{c}$, $B$) should be imaginary (real), respectively. The variables $\bar{c}$ and $B$ are Wick rotated. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    May 30, 2015 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ Note added: From quartic to cubic interaction: 1. Complex scalar: $\quad {\cal L}={\cal L}_2-\frac{1}{2}\lambda |\phi|^4$; Auxiliary real scalar: $\quad \widetilde{\cal L}={\cal L}_2 +\frac{1}{2}\varphi^2 \pm\sqrt{\lambda}\varphi |\phi|^2$; The variables $\varphi$ is Wick rotated. 2. YM idea: $\quad \varphi^{a}_{\mu\nu}:=f^{abc}A^b_{\mu}A^c_{\nu}$; 3. YM idea: $\quad \varphi^{ab}:=A^a_{\mu}A^{b\mu}$; $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Jul 29, 2020 at 15:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.