1
$\begingroup$

EDITED: The number of bonds is actually 2, not 1 (look at edit history). Fixed for archiving purposes.

Problem: The edge A of an homogeneous rod (of length $\ell$ and mass $m$) is performing a smooth circular motion around the center $O$ with a constant angular speed $\omega$. The motion takes place on the $Oxy$ plane without friction under the action of an attractive force $\vec{F}=-k \vec{r}_k$ (k>0), where $\vec{r}_k$ is the vector position of the center of mass. Note: In the original image from my textbook, it appears as if $F_k$ acts towards $(x,y)=(0,1)$ and not towards the origin $(0,0)$. There is no gravity.

Goal: To calculate the Lagrangian of the system.

Attempted solution: The rod is a solid body moving on a 2-dimensional plane. Therefore there are $3n-k$ degrees of freedom, where $n$ is the number of the bodies (here $n=1$) and $k$ is the number of bonds (here $k=2$), since the edge A is confined to move along the circle and the angular speed is constant. Subsequently, one needs 1 generalized coordinate to describe the system.

$\phi$ is angle between $(OA)$ and $Ox$ for which $|\dot{\phi}|=|\omega|$, but what would the generalized coordinate be ?

enter image description here


Based on the answer from @pppqqq, here is an updated diagram of the problem:

enter image description here

Pending issues: (These have been answered by @pppqqq)

  1. Are we assuming that the length of the rod is $\ell'=2\ell$ ? If not, shouldn't it be $x_{CM} = R\cos\phi + (\ell/2) \cos\theta$ ?
  2. Shouldn't $y_{CM}$ be $y_{CM} = R sin\phi−\ell\sin\theta$ (assuming that the length of the rod is $2\ell$)?
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The numbers of deegres of freedom for a planar body in the plane is $$\text{2 (coordinates of CM)}+1\text {(angles to determine the body orientation)}=3.$$

As you correctly recognize, the constraint is one: $$|\vec {OA}|=R,$$ so you need two numbers $\varphi, \theta$ to localize the body in the plane.

So, you have the first, $\varphi$, and I gave you a big hint by calling also the second with an angle-like name. The second number could be... ?


The second number could be the angle $\theta$ that the rod makes with an axis, say the $x$ axis.

With this the coordinates of the center of mass are (if $R$ is the radius of the circle, $2\ell$ the lenght of the rod) $$x_{\text {CM}}=R\cos \varphi +\ell \cos \theta,\qquad y_{\text {CM}}=R\sin \varphi +\ell \sin \theta .$$ The next step is to calculate the kinetic energy $T$ of the body. This comes in two parts (Koenig's theorem): $$T=T_{\text {CM}}+T_{\text {rotational}}.$$ The second one is simply: $$T_{\text {rotation}}=\frac {1}{2}I\dot \theta ^2=\frac{m\ell ^2}{6}\dot \theta ^2,$$ (the moment of inertia of a rigid rod about the CM is the variance of the uniform distribution, multiplied by $m$, $\frac{m L^2}{12}$). The other term is $$T_{\text {CM}}=m \frac {\dot x ^2+\dot y ^2}{2}=\frac{m}{2}(R^2 \dot \varphi ^2+\ell ^2 \dot \theta ^2+2R\ell\cos (\theta -\varphi)\dot \theta \dot \varphi )$$ (check the cosine term). I leave to you the potential energy; just a thing: to simplify the outcome, you can note that here you have

  1. A characteristic lenght, that you can choose as $R$ or $\ell$.
  2. A characteristic mass

Since the equations of motion are unaltered by a scaling of the lagrangian, you can divide the whole lagrangian by $mR^2$ or $m\ell ^2$, or simply, which is equivalent, set $m=1$, $R=1$. This will simplify your equations and make your life easier.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I assumed that, by saying $d=3n-k$, you were talking about the degrees of freedom for a system of $n$ particles. You are very welcome $\endgroup$
    – pppqqq
    Commented Feb 9, 2014 at 19:41
  • $\begingroup$ Are you assuming that the length of the rod is $2\ell$ ? If not, shouldn't it be $x_{CM} = R\cos\phi + (\ell/2)\cos\theta$ ? P.S. YOU ARE A GREAT PERSON. $\endgroup$
    – stathisk
    Commented Feb 9, 2014 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ Also, shouldn't $y_{CM}$ be $R\sin\phi - \ell\sin\theta$ ? $\endgroup$
    – stathisk
    Commented Feb 10, 2014 at 0:23
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Zet, yes you're right about $\ell /2$ instead of $\ell$. About the angle, it really depends on your notation. Conventionally, a “clockwise angle” is counted as negative. According to this convention, $-\sin \theta $, with the theta in your picture, gives a positive number. $\endgroup$
    – pppqqq
    Commented Feb 10, 2014 at 9:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you @pppqqq! You clear things out. I consider this question 'closed' :) Take care and keep excelling in physics! $\endgroup$
    – stathisk
    Commented Feb 10, 2014 at 15:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.