0
$\begingroup$

I would like to know if the physical reason why the scalar propagator satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation is due to the fact that "pictorially" its action is to represent a "virtual" particle with spin 0 (i.e., a scalar field) that propagates from point A to point B?

I assume this is the case because, being a particle with spin zero, even if virtual, it should still obey the same dynamics as on-shell particles with spin zero. Is this assumption correct?

And does it also apply to other spin values as well as to non-free theories (in the presence of a potential and thus a modification of the equations of motion)?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ p.s I know that it can be proved mathematically I was looking into a more phenomenological insight. $\endgroup$
    – Lip
    Commented Oct 4 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ For interacting theories, you should look at the Dyson-Schwinger equations. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 4 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ I will have a look, I only did the S-matrix approach in perturbation theory, but then the assumption is correct for a free theory ? $\endgroup$
    – Lip
    Commented Oct 4 at 15:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ General tip: Consider to only ask 1 question per post. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Oct 4 at 15:29

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$
  1. The scalar propagator $$\Delta(x)=i \langle 0 |T \,\phi(x) \phi(0)|0\rangle \tag{1}$$ does not satisfy the Klein-Gordon equation $(\square +m^2) \Delta(x)=0$, but $\Delta(x)$ is a Green function of the Klein-Gordon equation, satisfying $$ (\square +m^2)\Delta(x)=\delta^{(d)}(x) \tag{2}$$ together with Feynman boundary conditions. Its Fourier representation is thus given by $$\Delta(x)=\int \!\frac{d^dp}{(2 \pi)^d} \; \frac{e^{-ipx}}{m^2-p^2-i \epsilon}. \tag{3} \label{3} $$

  2. In contrast to an on-shell particle obeying the energy-momentum relation $p^2=m^2$ (corresponding to a particle in an initial or final asymptotic state), a virtual particle is off shell, i.e. $p^2 \ne 0$, in general. Thus, a virtual particle does not obey the same dynamics as a real one.

  3. Spin does not affect the position of the pole of the momentum-space propagator.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.