I know this is a fairly simple question, but my mind is completely blanking.
Say if I have some incident field $\mathbf{E} = E_0 \hat{e} \exp(\mathbf{k_1}\cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)$ to a crystal. The subsequent polarisation due to second order nonlinearities is given by:
$\mathbf{P} = \epsilon_0 \chi^{(2)} \mathbf{E}^2$
To calculate this, one can express the polarisation $\hat{e} = e_x \hat{e_x} + e_y \hat{e_y} + e_z \hat{e_z}$, and then write $\mathbf{E} = \begin{pmatrix} E_0 e_x \\E_0 e_y \\ E_0 e_z \end{pmatrix}$ and substitute into the above expression (which gives you a vector with 6 entries).
How does this change if the incoming wave had the same polarisation, but was propagating in a direction $\mathbf{k_2}$ instead of $\mathbf{k_1}$? My instinct is that this should change in some way, but there isn't a way to account for propagation direction in the conventional expression. I was considering using Maxwell's equations, but I wasn't sure what exactly I'd have to solve.
Thanks in advance.