1
$\begingroup$

I am studying BCS Theory for the first time, and I did encounter the Bogoliubov-Vitalin transformation for the BCS hamiltonian, that gives $$ \hat{\mathcal{H}} = - \sum_\mathbf{k} \sqrt{\xi_\mathbf{k}^2 + \Delta^2} + \sum_{k} \sqrt{\xi_\mathbf{k}^2 + \Delta^2} \left[ \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow}^\dagger \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow} + \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\downarrow}^\dagger \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\downarrow} \right] $$ where $\xi_\mathbf{k}\equiv\epsilon_\mathbf{k}-\epsilon_F$, and the $\gamma$ operators are: $$ \begin{cases} \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow} = u_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow} - v_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{-\mathbf{k}\downarrow}^\dagger \\ \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow}^\dagger = u_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow}^\dagger - v_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{-\mathbf{k}\downarrow} \end{cases} \qquad\qquad \begin{cases} \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\downarrow} = u_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{\mathbf{k}\downarrow} + v_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{-\mathbf{k}\uparrow}^\dagger \\ \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\downarrow}^\dagger = u_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{\mathbf{k}\downarrow}^\dagger + v_\mathbf{k} \hat{c}_{-\mathbf{k}\uparrow} \end{cases} $$ To derive this hamiltonian, following BCS Theory, the parameter $\Delta_\mathbf{k}$ was supposed to be a constant $\Delta$ inside a shell of extension $\hbar\omega_D$ (Debye energy) both inside and outside the Fermi sphere (in momentum space). Also, I used $u_\mathbf{k},v_\mathbf{k} \in \mathbb{R}$. By variational approach to the same problem, it is found $$ \Delta = 2\hbar\omega_D e^{-2/\rho_0 V_0} $$ with: $\rho_0$ the single particle DoS at the Fermi surface, $V_0$ the magnitude of the potential inside the interaction shell. This is precisely the binding energy of one Cooper pair (worked out starting from a "rigid" filled Fermi sphere and two electrons added outside).

The system was mapped onto a system of composite fermions and the $\hat{\gamma}$ operators create and destroy said fermions. It seems that the ground state of the system is the one with no $\gamma$ particles at all, and that should be the BCS ground state.

Context: Often textbooks plot the function $\sqrt{\xi^2 + \Delta^2}$, and argue that the system is gapped by an amount $\Delta$ and that explains the rigidity of the BCS ground state. That is the $\gamma$ band, so its states may be reached by applying the $\hat{\gamma}$ operator, which however does not conserve the number of particles, creating an electron-hole superposition.

Now: I expect that pumping in the system an energy $\Delta$ or greater, I can break a Cooper pair (i wouldn't know how to do it). But it seems like the first excited state does not contain the two "escaped" electrons or something similar, but instead one $\gamma$ fermion. In the sense, if I count the electrons in the state one is missing. I understand that the system is grand-canonical so particle number is not conserved, but physically I have trouble accepting this fact.

M. Thinkam (Introduction to Superconductivity, 2 Ed., pp.68-69) shows that the action of the $\hat{\gamma}$ operators on the BCS ground state is: $$ \hat{\gamma}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow}^\dagger \bigotimes_\mathbf{q} \left[ u_\mathbf{q} + v_\mathbf{q} \hat{c}_{\mathbf{q}\uparrow}^\dagger \hat{c}_{-\mathbf{q}\downarrow}^\dagger \right] |\Omega\rangle = \hat{c}_{\mathbf{k}\uparrow}^\dagger \bigotimes_{\mathbf{q}\neq\mathbf{k}} \left[ u_\mathbf{q} + v_\mathbf{q} \hat{c}_{\mathbf{q}\uparrow}^\dagger \hat{c}_{-\mathbf{q}\downarrow}^\dagger \right] |\Omega\rangle $$ so, to add one $\gamma$ particle means to have one electron in $\mathbf{k}\uparrow$, one hole in $-\mathbf{k}\downarrow$, and a BCS-like state everywhere else. Evidently doing this action we are modifying the number of particles of the states.

Question: If I take one Cooper pair and break it, and I want to conserve the number of electrons (in the sense that my final states has all the other Cooper pairs and two more particles floating around somehow but not as a Cooper pair), is it required more energy than to "adding one $\gamma$ particle"? And physically, if yes, why is the energy required higher than the pair binding energy?

tl;dr: "Oh, jeez, I lost one electron..."

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

$\Delta$ is the single-electron gap. I think the binding energy of a two-electron Cooper pair is $2\Delta$. That solves your problem.

Even though U(1) is spontaneously broken, (charge mod 2) is still conserved. And the $\gamma$ excitation does have a well-defined charge of (1 mod 2). Unless you specifically inject one unit of charge, no amount of pair breaking can give you a single $\gamma$.

(The grand canonical ensemble only permits fluctuation of particle number, not total electric charge. Granted, you can allow charge fluctuation with a "charge-dependent chemical potential", but that is for all intent and purposes an external electric potential.)

By the way, before you do Bogoliubov transform, the off-diagonal term in the Hamiltonian looks like pairs of electrons are constantly entering and leaving the condensate with equal probability. A pair-breaking perturbation as seen in the literature usually refers to something that breaks the balance.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer! I checked my calculations and the binding energy of the Cooper pair is $2\Delta$, as you say. So, would you say that even if the low-lying excitation spectrum is the one made of single $\gamma$ particles with gap $\Delta$, for an isolated superconductor the first excitation is one with one pair broken and two $\gamma$ particles added? It makes sense in terms of energy conservation. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 26 at 8:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.