I'm not able to comprehend the meaning of buoyant force. As per Archimedes Principle, it's the force equal to the weight of the volume of water displaced by the body. But wouldn't this be only true when an object is partially submerged?
As just for an example,I have a tub of water and a cube(of around same density as of water so that it doesn't sink or float but stay at a certain level throughout the time, say 1g/1cm³) of dimensions 1m, which is completely submerged inside at a certain depth, say the top surface of the cube is 5m from the surface of the water and the bottom part of the cube is 6m.
I find myself with two options to calculate it:
- To calculate the difference of forces experienced by the bottom and top surface of the cube which will give me the net force experienced by the cube.
- As the cube is at a constant position at the depth, the vertical forces should cancel each other out, thus the net force at the bottom part of the cube would be the same as the buoyant force it experiences,which seems logical to do.
1st Method:
Force on the bottom of the cube(F2): F(atmospheric pressure) + F(weight of cube) + F(weight of the fluid column just above the cube).
Force on top of the cube(F1): F(atmospheric pressure) + F(weight of fluid column above the cube)
---> Net force: F2 - F1 = F(due to the weight of cube) = m(cube) *g = 1000kg/m³ * 1m³ * 10m/sec² (to make calculation easy) = 10⁴N
2nd Method: Total force experienced at the bottom part of the cube = Buoyant force:
F2 = F(atmospheric) + F(weight of cube) + F(weight of fluid column above)
----> 10⁵N(approx.) + 10000N + 50000(5m*1m² * 10000kg/m³ * 10m/sec²) = (10⁵ + 60000)N
Here I got 2 different values , although I believe the first method seems more related to what the principle says, but wouldn't the total force experienced at the bottom point of the cube be the actual buoyant force?