2
$\begingroup$

imageI'm studying Ray D'Inverno's book "Introducing Einstein's relativity". I'm having trouble understanding Fig. 17.7 (pag. 236), which is an illustration of compactified Minkowski spacetime. Especially, I don't understand how $r'$ coordinate is measured on the cylinder: there are two vertical straight lines on the cylinder labelled $r' = 0$ and $r' = \pi$, but if I want to individuate, say, $r' = \frac{\pi}{3}$, how should I proceed? Thank you for your answers.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ I've included it just now. $\endgroup$
    – Al01
    Commented Sep 21, 2023 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ Are you wondering which way around you should go? It wouldn’t matter as far as I can tell. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Sep 21, 2023 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ I believe $r'$ is considered as an angular coordinate. In the book, on the page preceding this figure, he states that constant $t$ coordinate slices have the topology of a three sphere, so in that case $r'$ would be treated as an angular coordinate. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2023 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ So do the points on the cylinder with $r' = c$, where $c$ is a constant and $0 \leq c \leq \pi$, lie on the vertical straight line making an angle with $r'=0$ equal to $c$ when measured from the axis of the cylinder, no matter the direction (clockwise or counterclockwise)? $\endgroup$
    – Al01
    Commented Sep 21, 2023 at 20:10
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, except the direction (clockwise or counterclockwise) does matter. Just pick one of these directions for angles between $0$ and $\pi$. Then the other direction is for angles between $\pi$ and $2\pi$. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Sep 21, 2023 at 20:50

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Although in the cylinderical diagram the time coordiante $t'$ has the range $$ -\infty < t' < \infty$$

the relavent range is only from $$ -\pi< t' < \pi $$

As such, the conformally compactified region of the Minkowski spacetime is only the diamond region of the cylinder with boundaries ($\mathscr{I}^{+}, \mathscr{I}^{-}$).

In addition we pick any one side of this diamond with $ 0 \leq r' \leq\pi$. As two dimensions are suppressed, on its own the compactified region would appear like shown in the image below.

In this image $r' \in (0, \pi)$ and $r' = \pi/3$ would lie at a distance 1/3 from the LHS along the lines $t = $ const.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

$r'$ is just the angular position on the cylinder's surface. In the Penrose diagram (Fig. 17.9), it's the horizontal coordinate.

From comments, I think you're confused because there is a second copy of the Penrose diagram running from $0$ to $-π$ (or $π$ to $2π$). That's a peculiarity of the 1+1 dimensional case. In $d+1$ dimensions, the compactification lives on the surface of $S^d\times \mathbb R$, and the points at a fixed $r'$ ($0<r'<π$) form a $(d-1)$-sphere of radius $\sin r'$. If $d>1$, that's a continuous surface, and you can cover it with the $θ,φ$ of the original Minkowski space. If $d=1$, it's two points, and it's easiest to allow $r'$ to take negative values—the same thing that happens if you try to put polar coordinates on 1D Euclidean space.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ When you say "the horizontal coordinate" do you mean simply that I have to draw on Fig. 17.9 (that one showing the Penrose diagram) a vertical straight line at a distance from the left vertical edge equal to the value of the coordinate? As if I had a cartesian (x,y) 2D coordinate system? $\endgroup$
    – Al01
    Commented Sep 22, 2023 at 6:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.