1
$\begingroup$

Consider here a background metric $g_{\mu\nu}$, we impose a perturbation $g_{\mu\nu}+\epsilon h_{\mu\nu}$ with $\epsilon\ll1$. Then we can write down the modified Einstein-Hilbert action with zero cosmological constant: \begin{align} S&=\int\mathrm{d}^{D}x\sqrt{-g}\left(1-\epsilon\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}g^{\mu\nu}\right)\left(R^{0}+\epsilon R^{1}\right)\\ &=S^{0}+\epsilon\int\mathrm{d}^{D}x\sqrt{-g}\left(R^{1}-\frac{1}{2}R^{0}g_{\mu\nu}h^{\mu\nu}\right)+\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)\, \end{align} where $R^{0}$ is the Ricci scalar w.r.t $g_{\mu\nu}$, and $R^{1}$ is the correction of $R$ at the leading order which can be found in this answer.

To my knowledge, if for any: $$\delta_{\zeta}h_{\mu\nu}=\nabla_{\mu}\zeta_{\nu}+\nabla_{\nu}\zeta_{\mu}=\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g_{\mu\nu} \, \ \ \ \delta_{\zeta}g_{\mu\nu}=0 \,$$ the action is invariant at each order, this theory is gauge invariant, and the perturbation field $h_{\mu\nu}$ is a spin-2 gauge field. For example, when the background is flat $g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}$, $R^{0}=0$, one can check this easily, for an arbitrary $\zeta \ $: \begin{align} \delta_{\zeta}S&=\delta_{\zeta}S^0+\epsilon\int\mathrm{d}^{D}x\sqrt{-g}\delta_{\zeta}R^{1} +\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)\\ &=0. \end{align} But for a curved background $R^{0}\ne 0$, in principle one should show whether: $$\int\mathrm{d}^Dx\sqrt{-g}\left(\delta_{\zeta}R^{1}-\frac{1}{2}R^{0}g_{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g^{\mu\nu}\right)=0 \ .$$ According to the P4 eq(2.4) in this paper 2110.13512, one find \begin{equation} \delta_{\zeta}R^{1}=\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R^{0}. \end{equation} Thus, for any $g_{\mu\nu}$ \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g^{\mu\nu}&=\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}(g^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu})-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g^{\mu\nu}\\ &=g^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R_{\mu\nu}+\left[R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}\right]\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g^{\mu\nu}\\ &=g^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R_{\mu\nu}+\mathrm{EoM}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g^{\mu\nu} \end{align} if $g_{\mu\nu}$ is a solution of field equation, the gauge invariance of a linearized theory if and only if $\delta_{\zeta}R^1_{\mu\nu}=\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R^0_{\mu\nu}=0$, as expected. But it is not easy to calculate. So on the other hand, we express it as \begin{align} \mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R-\frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g^{\mu\nu}&=\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}R+\frac{1}{2}Rg^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}_{\zeta}g_{\mu\nu}\\ &=\zeta^\mu\nabla_\mu R+R\nabla_\mu\zeta^\mu\\ &=\nabla_\mu(\zeta^\mu R) \end{align} This equation states that a theory is gauge invariant if and only if $\zeta^\mu R^{0}\big|_{\partial\mathcal{M}}=0$. This result is suspicious to me, is something wrong here?

Especially, for $dS$ spacetime, this boundary term is non-zero. So is there a gauge-invariant linearized theory in $dS$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Gauge symmetry for a linearized theory

Consider a gravity theory allowing a cosmological constant described by the Hilbert-Einstein action $$S[g]=\int_\mathcal{M}\mathrm{d}^nx\sqrt{-g}\left(R-2\Lambda\right)\, ,$$ which is invariant under an arbitrary diffeomorphism transformation $$x^\mu\rightarrow x^\mu+\xi^\mu(x)\, ,$$ but usually, a distinct viewpoint attributing all transformations on the field is more useful $$g_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow g_{\mu\nu}+(\nabla_{\mu}\xi_{\nu}+\nabla_{\nu}\xi_{\mu})\, .$$ Now we divide the whole spacetime metric into two parts $$g_{\mu\nu}+\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}+ h_{\mu\nu}\, ,$$ where we set $\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}$ as a background field, which is fixed thus with no dynamics - a given solution of field equation, $$S^\prime[h]=S[h+\bar{g}]\, .$$ Thus the theory of $h_{\mu\nu}$ inherits the diffeomorphism symmetry from the whole theory of $g_{\mu\nu}$, i.e. under \begin{align} \delta_\xi \bar{g}_{\mu\nu}&=0\\ \delta_\xi h_{\mu\nu}&=\nabla_{\mu}\xi_{\nu}+\nabla_{\nu}\xi_{\mu}\, \\ &=\bar{\nabla}_{\mu}\xi_{\nu}+\bar{\nabla}_{\nu}\xi_{\mu}-2\delta\Gamma^{\rho}_{\ \mu\nu}\xi_\rho\, ,\\ &=\bar{\nabla}_{\mu}\xi_{\nu}+\bar{\nabla}_{\nu}\xi_{\mu}+\mathcal{O}(h\xi)\\ \delta\Gamma^{\rho}_{\ \mu\nu}&=\frac{1}{2}[\bar{\nabla}_\mu h_{\nu}^{\ \rho}+\bar{\nabla}_\nu h_{\mu}^{\ \rho}-\bar{\nabla}^\rho h_{\mu\nu}]\propto \mathcal{O}(h)\, . \end{align} the $S^\prime$ is invariant.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.