0
$\begingroup$

I'm having a question concerning the quantum harmonic oscillator: If, for instance, $\omega\to 0$ the Hamiltonian $$ \hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2\tag{1} $$ becomes that of a free particle, but the energy eigenvalues don't. Why is there such a distinction between the two cases? I get that intuitively it becomes continuous, however I wasn't able to find a more mathematical way to make $$E_n\to \hbar^2 k^2/2m\tag{2}$$ in this limit.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As $\omega \rightarrow 0$ the separation of the energy levels tends to 0, giving you the continuous spectrum of a free particle. Can you explain your issue a little more? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2023 at 8:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I get that intuitively it becomes continuous, however I wasn't able to find a more mathematical way to make $E_n\to \hbar^2 k^2/2m$ in this limit. $\endgroup$
    – astro-dk
    Commented Jul 11, 2023 at 8:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I suppose the reason is simply that you (more or less implicitly) assumed a non-zero (perhaps even positive) $\omega$ in the derivation of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the QHO. Also note that for $\omega=0$, all the harmonic oscillator eigenstates become the zero vector, which by definition is not an eingenstate of any operator. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2023 at 9:02
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks a lot, I think I got it. $\endgroup$
    – astro-dk
    Commented Jul 11, 2023 at 9:38
  • $\begingroup$ Correction to my previous comment: I meant the normalized vectors. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11, 2023 at 11:36

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$
  1. One idea is to put the QHO$^1$ $$H~=~\frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{m\omega^2x^2}{2}+\infty \cdot\theta(\frac{L}{2}-|x|) $$ in a box of length $L$.

  2. On the one hand, well above a threshold energy $$ E_{\rm threshold}~=~\frac{m\omega^2L^2}{8} $$ the energy eigenvalues behaves like a particle in a box $$E_n~=~\frac{(\hbar k_n)^2}{2m}, \qquad k_n~=~\frac{n\pi}{L}, \qquad n~\in~\mathbb{N},$$ which should be compared with OP's eq. (2).

  3. On the other hand, well below the threshold energy $E_{\rm threshold}$ the energy eigenvalues behaves like a QHO.

  4. Now remove the harmonic potential $\omega\to 0$ and remove the box $L\to \infty$ in such a way that $\omega L\to 0$ so that $E_{\rm threshold}\to 0$.

--

$^1$ Here we assume that $\infty\cdot 0~=~0$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Picking up on @Tobias's argument, the natural unit of length for this problem is $\lambda=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}}$, and so depends on $\omega$. Since all solutions are functions of the dimensionless quantity $x/\lambda$, you immediately see you are in trouble if you let $\omega\to 0$ as any solution of the form $e^{-(x/\lambda)^2/2}H_n(x/\lambda)$ behaves badly. In other words, taking the $\omega\to 0$ limit is delicate business and may not be feasible at all.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.