3
$\begingroup$

Once an entangled particle is measured, it's wave function collapses. From my understanding, any sort of information exchanged to the particles can be considered a mistaken measurement. So how do researchers entangle particles, move them apart and then measure them? I assume they are held in vacuum and are maintained within a specified volume of space through magnetic confinement, but I would think that the magnetic fields holding them would also consequentially be a measurement on them. So I am at a loss as how they keep them entangled until an actual measurement is performed. I assume it's because my understanding of what is considered a measurement is flawed since I've read that even energy can be delivered to entangled particles even without collapsing their wave functions.

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ " So how do researchers entangle particles, move them apart and then measure them?" Very carefully. It is quite hard to do without accidental decoherenece. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented May 18, 2023 at 3:46
  • $\begingroup$ Also, this question will probably not be very well received on this Stack Exchange. You might want to try posting at the Quantum Computing Stack Exchange: quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented May 18, 2023 at 3:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It depends on what is entangled. For example, vacuum is not needed for polarization entanglement. $\endgroup$
    – kludg
    Commented May 18, 2023 at 4:08
  • $\begingroup$ The particle picture is merely an unfortunate byproduct of the science history of quantum mechanics. It doesn't serve much of a purpose and certainly doesn't help with the understanding of entanglement. In reality we are merely measuring quanta of energy that are being exchanged between quantum fields. The "quantum" is the amount of energy that flows during measurement. It doesn't exist either before or after a measurement. So the only requirement for a quantum field to "keep" a state of two entangled quanta is that no other irreversible process (other than the measurements) take place. $\endgroup$ Commented May 18, 2023 at 5:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you all for all the inputs! It was interesting reading the discussion. @naturallyInconsistent your explanation is certainly what I was considering when I first posed the question! $\endgroup$
    – Sophia
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 4:47

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

When experiments are performed on entangled pairs: Photons are the most common choices for entangling quanta, and Bell tests are common uses of entangled pairs. Generally, the entangled photons are NOT stored at all. Upon creation, they are routed to detectors for measurement on the desired basis (polarization/spin is common, but there are also many other bases). Usually there will be a lens of some type to collect the photons, and then focus them towards their respective detector apparati.

They may be routed through the open air or through fiber without much loss in fidelity (i.e. without unintended decoherence/collapse*). For example, open air Bell tests have been performed across distances of 144 kilometers and greater. Fiber has been used for 100 kilomters. Photons may also have certain operations performed on them which will not cause collapse: filtering at a specific wavelength, applying half/quarter wave plates, refection via mirrors, certain types of lenses or splitters, etc. Here are references of some experiments, which describe their specific setups:

https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9810080

https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0607182

https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.3620

Other particle types will have different requirements to insure that there is no loss of entanglement prior to when measurements are taken. There may be temporary storage. And temperature (thermal effects) may be a consideration, with cooling necessary. There are a lot of types of quantum objects that can be entangled. Here is a Bell test using entanglement of electron holes:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1207

*Using the common meaning of "collapse" in the literature.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the thorough answer with references! My initial thought when I was writing the question was that there is a whole set of quantities that can be entangled and so long as the methods for moving/storing entangled particles don't interact with the entangled quantities, then they stay that way. But I wasn't sure (Why I asked the question in the first place!). That's super interesting though that they may stay entangled even in matter as I would think that any light-matter interactions would alter all the possible entangled variables. I'll definitely take a look at the papers! $\endgroup$
    – Sophia
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 4:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.