Confusion arised out of reading this answer, it says
You can immediately describe the 2 particles by their center of mass description (an atom) plus their individual attributes (i.e. what the particles are doing within the atom). Assuming the 2 particles start off at rest, then they are in a bound state already because they can't escape each other (go off to infinite separation) due to lack of energy.
It would seem to me that, that we could, for instance, we could pair any proton in the universe with an electorn anywhere else and call that as an atom. This is at least consistent with Bohr Theory as we can take radius as large as we want.
So, would a question asking "if a proton and electron can combine" to form an atom be non-sensical? or, is my understanding of what an "atom" means wrong?