1
$\begingroup$

In the paper Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy and Strange Metals, the following Maxwell relation is given (equation 40) $$\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial Q}\right)_T = - \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial T}\right)_Q\tag{40}$$ where $S$ is the entropy per particle, $Q$ is the fermionic number density $Q = \frac{1}{N}\sum _{i=1}^N\langle \hat{c}_i^\dagger \hat{c}_i\rangle$, $T$ is the temperature and $\mu$ is the chemical potential.

The Maxwell relations in the Grand canonical ensemble, should be derivable from the differential $$d\Omega = - S dT - Q d \mu - p d V.$$

Given the Sachdev's identity however, it would imply the existence of some differential $$dz = S dQ - \mu dT.$$

Which I cannot see as a general relation, so what am I missing? There is a chance that this relation only holds as one is taking $T\to 0$. Then, I would still like to know how one shows this in general.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Consider the Legendre transform $G=\Omega+\mu Q$ then $$dG=-SdT+\mu dQ-pdV$$ The first derivatives are $$S=-\left({\partial G\over\partial T}\right)_{Q},\quad\quad \mu=\left({\partial G\over\partial Q}\right)_{T}$$ The equality $${\partial^2G\over\partial T\partial Q} ={\partial^2G\over\partial Q\partial T}$$ leads to $$-\left({\partial S\over\partial Q}\right)_{T} =\left({\partial \mu\over\partial T}\right)_{Q}$$ as expected.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.