To make clearer what I am asking let me introduce a new terminology to avoid any misunderstandings. Let the heat flow, which is rate, between a reservoir and an engine be denoted by $\mathfrak J$ and the absorbed or rejected amount of thermal energy by $\mathfrak Z$ for the Greek word "zesti" $\zeta \epsilon \sigma \tau \eta$ whose meaning in English is something like "heat". As far as I know nobody else has used this terminology and I know no Greek but here I will use this word, and I apologize to Greek language speakers if this be a wrong usage. Note that $\mathfrak J$ is directly observable by calorimetric measurement.
Similarly, let $\mathfrak w$ denote the work rate by or on the engine and $\mathfrak L$ denote the delivered work for the Italian "lavoro", so it is all scientific sounding now. In this sense, when one writes $dU = \delta Q + \delta W$ what is really meant that over an infinitesimal time interval the internal energy increases by $\mathfrak Z = \delta Q = \mathfrak J dt$ and by $\mathfrak L = \delta W = \mathfrak w dt$.
I do not believe so far anything here is controversial.
This is a question on interpretation of the happenings inside a reversible heat engine performing a Carnot cycle and not about the correctness of the 1st and 2nd laws expressed in the maximum Carnot efficiency, in which I believe as strongly as anybody else can.
Take the usual picture of a heat engine performing a reversible Carnot cycle. Due to heat flow from the high temperature reservoir to the infinitesimally lower temperature engine the internal energy of the engine is increased by a quantity of zesti $\mathfrak Z_H= \int \mathfrak J_H dt$ . The engine performs total work $W$ and thus in the lower temperature isothermal segment an amount of "zesti" $\mathfrak Z_a = \int \mathfrak J_a dt$ will be rejected and per the 1st law where $\mathfrak Z_a = \mathfrak Z_H -W$ at the low temperature $T_a$.
The entropy absorbed from and delivered to the reservoirs at temperatures $T_H$ and $T_a$ are equal to $$S=\frac{\mathfrak Z_H}{T_H}=\frac{\mathfrak Z_a}{T_a}\tag{1}\label{1}$$ because all four legs of the cycle is reversible including the adiabatic ones and thus entropy of the engine with its environment is conserved in toto.
Most description of the Carnot cycle uses an ideal gas as the working fluid but that is not necessary because the 1st and 2nd laws and consequent maximality of the Carnot efficiency hold for any reversible or irreversible processes. But we can say with certainty that by the very definition of a reversible adiabatic process in which no change of entropy either inside the engine or outside its environment can happen, all entropy changes are confined to the two isothermal reversible legs of the cycle.
Now as is usually asserted the heat transported and thus the heat flow rate time integrated to an amount of "zesti" and absorbed at the higher temperature $T_H$ is transformed by the engine to work. If such transformation takes an arbitrarily small but finite time then it must follow that first we have thermal energy absorbed and then a bit later we get work. Consequently, this must mean that while this happens at $T_H$ somehow we will have also "destroyed" some of the engine's internal entropy by an amount of $$\Delta S_H = \frac{W}{T_H}=\frac{\mathfrak Z_H}{T_H}-\frac{\mathfrak Z_a}{T_H}= S\left(1-\frac{T_a}{T_H}\right)\tag{2}\label{2}$$ which by the end of the cycle will have to be produced in the low temperature compression leg to balance the total entropy change to be zero per $\eqref{1}$.
Of course not all work of the engine is done at $T_H$ because some of the work is also delivered in the reversible adiabatic leg but that leg is isentropic, so the internal entropy change must occur either before or after. But how does the engine know that at $T_H$ it is to "destroy" $\Delta S_H = S \left(1-\frac{T_a}{T_H}\right)$ an amount that also depends on $T_a$?
So how does the engine that performs a reversible Carnot cycle transforms the absorbed "zesti" to work?