7
$\begingroup$

I still don't really understand what contextuality means in reference to quantum mechanics. If someone could give a clear definition that would be great. It sounds like it means you can't always relate the state of a system to its wavefunction or something? That confuses me since it seems to violate quantum mechanics. So a clear explanation would be great.

The question is then, does any interpretation of quantum mechanics require us to accept contextuality? This paper seems to claim yes, but I don't know enough to evaluate it, so would appreciate a professional's eye: http://arxiv.com/abs/1006.0500

(This is a follow up on a previous question: What combinations of realism, non-locality, and contextuality are ruled out in quantum theory? )

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

I think this should clear it up that quantum mechanics in it's all models or interpretations is indeed contextual. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0406166

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ +1, Hard to write something better here than the paper you cite. It seems a better starting point for discussion than arxiv.com/abs/1006.0500, which at a glance seems slightly idiosyncratic. The definition of operational equivalence in section II seems problematic, however, because of its reliance on the phrase "every possible measurement procedure", insofar as advances in Physics precisely depend on previously unconceived measurement procedures. Particularly if we devote all our effort to discriminating one preparation apparatus from another. Absolutely identical? $\endgroup$
    – Peter Morgan
    Commented Mar 22, 2011 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ Peter, I think Spekkens mentions this worry in the conclusions, although he leaves it for future work: "The question of whether an experimental test of contextuality is even possible has been the subject of some controversy, due to the finite precision of real experimental procedures. The problem...is that finite precision might imply that in practice no two experimental procedures are found to be operationally equivalent.... A possible resolution of this finite precision loophole is to further generalize the definition..." $\endgroup$
    – Jess Riedel
    Commented Apr 2, 2014 at 17:54
4
$\begingroup$

To understand contextuality in QM see this helpful example

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please add the yes or no answer to this? A simple link isn't a very good answer. $\endgroup$
    – B T
    Commented Jan 24, 2015 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ Images in the link are now broken $\endgroup$
    – Mauricio
    Commented Mar 29, 2022 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.