2
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a generic Lagrangian density, for example: $$\mathcal{L} = \alpha A_{\mu\nu}A^{\mu\nu} + \beta B_{\mu}f_\nu(p^2) A^{\mu\nu} + \gamma B_\mu\partial^\mu h$$ where $A_{\mu\nu}$,$B_\mu$ and $h$ are generic fields, $f_\nu(p^2)$ a generic function and $\alpha$,$\beta$,$\gamma$ some real parameters.

I have doubts about the calculation of the propagators for the system of fields $\{A_{\mu\nu},B_\mu,h\}$, correct me if I'm wrong.

I know that the propagator of a field is the green function for its equation and in general to calculate them I put the equations of the fields in Fourier space inside a matrix and look for the inverse.

My question is if, just by looking at the Lagrangian density, I can can say something about the propagators. For example, is it correct to say that since there are no quadratic terms in $B_\mu$ and in $h$, their propagators are null? And since there are no coupling terms between $A_{\mu\nu}$ and $h$ the propagator $$\langle0|T[A_{\mu\nu}^\dagger(x)h(0)]|0\rangle$$ is also null?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to PSE. I have never seen a propagator as a two point function between one type of field and another. Why do you think that there should exist such a propagator? What would the physical meaning of something like that be? Also, keep in mind that the propagator is derived from the terms in the Lagrangian that are quadratic wrt a specific type of field and they also contain derivatives of that field. $\endgroup$
    – schris38
    Commented Sep 13, 2022 at 9:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I agree that the propagators between different types of fields are not part of Feynamn diagrams but one could calculate them a priori. $\endgroup$
    – Fred
    Commented Sep 13, 2022 at 10:23

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$
  1. Formally speaking, if the Hessian matrix of the quadratic action is non-degenerate, the free propagator is given by the inverse matrix, cf. e.g. my related Phys.SE answer here.

  2. Concerning OP's last question: If a matrix element is zero, the corresponding inverse matrix element might not necessarily be zero.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the reply. So one way to calculate propagators (even those between different types of fields like the one I wrote) is to find the inverse of the matrix. But to reduce the calculations, is it correct to observe that since there are no quadratic terms in the fields B and h, the latter are not fields of matter and therefore their propagator is necessarily null? $\endgroup$
    – Fred
    Commented Sep 13, 2022 at 10:23
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't check your example, but not generically. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Sep 13, 2022 at 10:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.