0
$\begingroup$

Follow up to this question: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/215542/.

The OP asks "(Why) is the general solution an integral and not a sum of all linearly independent solutions?".

I am reading Griffiths' QM, and referencing a claim made in Section 2.4 on free particles. This section says that

"[separable solutions for free particle] play a mathematical role....the general solution to the time-dependent schrodinger equation is still a linear combination of separable solutions (only this time it's an integral over the continuous variable $k$ instead of a sum over the discrete index $n$)",

then presents the following formula

$$\psi (x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi}}\int ^{\infty}_{\infty}\phi (k)e^{(i(kx - \frac{hk^2}{2m}t))}dk.$$

My question is where the assumption is made that allows us to use the integral formulation here as opposed to a sum one and what the physical context and meaning of this decision is. To clarify, I'm looking for a conceptual explanation to accompany whatever math is being done here.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

$k$ is a continuous variable. This is simply because if you imagine all possible plane waves on an infinite line, they have the form $e^{ikx}$, where $k$ is any real number.

So to expand a function $\psi(x)$ into the $k$ basis, you would want to have a sum over every possible value of $k$, of a coefficient $c_k$ times the basis function $e^{ikx}$. But you can't sum over a real valued quantity; when you use $\Sigma$ notation, the index must be integer valued (aka, discrete).

There is a fix for this, which is to discretize the values of $k$ into an array of values $k_n = \frac{n}{N} k_{\rm max}$, with $n=-N, 1, \cdots, N$, and then take the limit $N\rightarrow \infty$. In this setup, we have actually have also truncated the range of $k$ so it spans from $-k_{\rm max}$ to $+k_{\rm max}$ instead of $-\infty$ to $+\infty$; to correct for this error we will also simultaneously take the limit $k_{\rm max} \rightarrow \infty$ in what follows. In equations, the limit we are taking has the form \begin{equation} \psi(x) = \lim_{k_{\rm max}\rightarrow \infty}\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \sum_{n=-N}^N c_{k_n} e^{i k_n x} \end{equation} In order to be able to take the limit in a clean way, we re-express the coefficient $c_{k_n}$ as $c_{k_n} = \phi(k_n) \Delta k$, where $\Delta k = k_{n+1}-k_n=\frac{k_{\rm max}}{N}$ is the distance between neighboring $k$ values in our grid. This step can be done without loss of generality because it is just a definition of $\phi(k_n)$; we are only doing it to make the limit easier to take.

Then the expression becomes \begin{equation} \psi(x) = \lim_{k_{\rm max}\rightarrow \infty} \left[\lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \sum_{n=-N}^N \phi(k_n) e^{i k_n x} \Delta k \right] \end{equation} At this point, you should recognize the definition of the Riemann integral in the square brackets above. After using the definition, we have \begin{equation} \psi(x) = \lim_{k_{\rm max}\rightarrow \infty} \int_{-k_{\rm max}}^{k_{\rm max}} d k \phi(k) e^{i k x} = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dk \phi(k) e^{ikx} \end{equation} which is the integral expression you are interested in. As you can see, the integral does arise from a sum of an expansion coefficient times a basis function. However, the mathematical details of detailing with a continuous "index" $k$ led us to express the sum as a limit (which became an integral), instead of an ordinary sum.

The extra factors of $\sqrt{2\pi}$ are just conventional normalizations; we can always rescale $\phi(k)$ to obtain that normalization. I didn't do it here because that is just a detail and I wanted to focus on the main idea. Similarly, while I have not explicitly included the time dependence, it is easy to put it in since each plane wave $e^{ikx}$ is an energy eigenstate for a free particle, so the time evolution simply amounts to multiplying each basis function by a phase $e^{-i E t/\hbar}$, where $E=p^2/2m=\hbar^2 k^2/2m$ is the energy.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.