2
$\begingroup$

In Standard Model, the Higgs doublet is \begin{equation} \Phi=\left(\begin{array}{c}\phi^+\\ \phi^0\end{array}\right) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{c} \phi_1+i\phi_2\\ \phi_3+i\phi_4 \end{array}\right) \end{equation}

The complex conjugate of Higgs double is

\begin{equation} \Phi^*=\left(\begin{array}{c}\phi^-\\ \phi^{0*}\end{array}\right) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{c} \phi_1-i\phi_2\\ \phi_3-i\phi_4 \end{array}\right) \end{equation}

Question : restricting to the topic of Higgs physics, what is present in the universe :

  1. The Higgs doublet only ?
  2. The complex conjugate of the Higgs doublet ?
  3. Both the Higgs doublet and its complex conjugate ?

The picture in wikipedia there : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_formulation_of_the_Standard_Model#/media/File:Standard_Model_Of_Particle_Physics--Most_Complete_Diagram.png

would make believe that only the Higgs doublet is present in the universe. But is it true ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The two field doublets you are writing down involve the same four $\phi_i$s, and they constitute different arrangements of them, so they make no difference in the amplitudes involved and their physics implications. (The physical Higgs particle is linked to $\phi_3-v$.)

They are all "present" in our universe, as would any other rewriting of them, such as $\tilde \Phi$, etc... As long as the interactions and couplings of each are specified clearly, and each is fit into the SM we know, there should be no issue. Recall both $\Phi$ and $\Phi^*$ are present in the real covariant kinetic term in the SM Lagrangian written in the practical notation.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ $W^+$ "eats" $\phi^+$. $W^-$ "eats" $\phi^-$. $Z$ "eats" $i\phi_4$. So "who" eats $-i\phi_4$ ? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2022 at 20:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you look at the relevant "eating term" resulting from the Higgs covariant derivative squared, that involves both a $\Phi$ and a $\Phi^*$, and amounts to $g^2v^2 (Z^\mu/sin \theta_w -\partial^\mu \phi_4/gv )^2/2$, so the Z ate $\sin\theta_w~ \phi_4/gv$ gauged into it. Both the i and the -i play a role, and neither features in the gauge absorption by the Z. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2022 at 21:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And, of course, nobody eats $\phi_3 -v$, which is why the Higgs particle is around... $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 18, 2022 at 22:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.