I wrote a post few days earlier on circular motion but it seems i still haven't got the hang of it yet. When is this equation actually true? $s=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2$
Suppose velocity is given by $v=t-2$ where $t$ is time. If we apply the equation above, it gives $s=0$ meaning no displacement but it surely travelled some distance. Hence showing that this equation is only valid for displacement.
Now in case of circular motion, when using variables along the circle, we take $s$ as the arc length and use the equation above taking $a$ as tangential acceleration. But i just gave a counter-example above that $s$ must be displacement where arc length is distance. How are then we being able to use the equation of motion for curved paths?
Please take it with a grain of salt if you think this is just a roundabout way of phrasing my previous post but this doubt is bugging me out and i think a new thread is needed to solve this issue once and for all.