1
$\begingroup$

The potential due to a dipole sheet, $S$, having dipole moment density, $\vec\tau$ (per unit area), is given by $$ \phi(\mathbf r) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_S\frac{\vec\tau(\mathbf r')\cdot(\mathbf{r-r'})}{|\mathbf{r-r'}|^3} dS'. $$

Now, if I naïvely calculate $\mathbf E$ as $-\nabla\phi$ (as $\nabla$ operates only on $\mathbf r$, it will pass through the integral), then I'll get Dirac's delta in the integrand, meaning that $\mathbf E$ is $0$ everywhere ($\mathbf r$ not on the sheet, $S$), which is obviously wrong.

Question: What has gone awry? The same method yields correct results for electric field due to a charged sheet.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In analogy with dipole charges, a dipole sheet can be approximated as two infinite parallel sheets of opposite charge density separated by some distance. What is the electric field in the volume not between the two sheets?

Now let the sheets come together while keeping the dipole moment per unit area constant. Does anything change about the electric field?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Why infinite sheets? I never specified that the dipole sheet was infinite. $\endgroup$
    – Atom
    Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 11:02
  • $\begingroup$ Also, I am reluctant to use these "physicist's" limiting process unless made rigorous. $\endgroup$
    – Atom
    Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Atom just so you’re aware, your comments are coming off a little snarky and combative. Is that your intention? $\endgroup$
    – Gilbert
    Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 11:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gilbert Oh! I never intended to be like that. But it's my fault if anybody felt that way. I'll try to be more considerate in the future. Thanks for informing. $\endgroup$
    – Atom
    Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 11:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.