1
$\begingroup$

In his book "Modern Particle Physics" Mark Thomson has the following Figures for $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$: enter image description here

(i) Concerning the first Feynman diagram in Figure 6.2: Couldn't the intermediate loop also contain $\mu^{-}\mu^{+}$?

(ii) Concerning the second Feynman diagram in Figure 6.2: This is how I understand what is drawn. Could somebody please tell me whether my understanding is correct? enter image description here

(iii) Concerning the third Feynman diagram in Figure 6.2: Here I drew my understanding of the diagram: enter image description here

So basically an $e^{-}$ emits a photon $\gamma$ but is still an $e^{-}$ and this emitted photon is absorbed by a muon $\mu^{-}$ which still stays a muon $\mu^{-}$. Is that diagram correct? :-)

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Once you get to higher order diagrams, I'd recommend moving away from the notion that a Feynman diagram represents anything other than a diagrammatic representation of a formal mathematical process - there is no photon that is physically emitted by the electron $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 6, 2020 at 13:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the diagrams from Thomson, the "e" just represents the coupling at that vertex, not the species of fermion at that loop. Strictly speaking, the loop in the first diagram could be a tau lepton or even a quark in the SM: but these contributions will be suppressed in the IR.... $\endgroup$
    – hulsey
    Commented Dec 7, 2020 at 7:26

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In order to turn Feynman diagrams to calculations, one needs, in addition to having the correct quantum numbers on the virtual particles, the coupling constants at the vertices.

There are three fundamental forces in elementary particle interactions, and the three coupling constants are very different in orders of magnitude. So when one talks of "higher orders" one has to evaluate the couplings at the vertices within the content of "higher" . Weak interaction loops are not forbidden but are much depressed by the couplings that one ignores them when electromagnetic couplings are available, in order counting.

I want to include the comment for the second question ,which is formulated as if the internal lines are real particles, they are virtual particles, just place holders for the transmission of quantum numbers. Their mass is off mass shell, that is why they are defined as virtual. As Nihar Karve says in his comment to the question:

Once you get to higher order diagrams, I'd recommend moving away from the notion that a Feynman diagram represents anything other than a diagrammatic representation of a formal mathematical process - there is no photon that is physically emitted by the electron –

As for the last diagram, there are still four electromagnetic vertices, so it is the same order of magnitude as the others.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.