2
$\begingroup$

I have learnt in the lecture that the symmetry factor of the following diagram is 1/2:

enter image description here

where the line corresponds to a gluon. But why is this the case?

We get 1/2 from 2nd order in pertubation theory. Then we get a factor of 2 for the interchangeability of the internal vertices, a factor of 3*3 for the connection of the external lines with one of the internal lines of the corresponding vertex and a factor of 2 for the connection of the internal lines, which are left. Therefore, I would get a symmetry factor of 18.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

The Feynman rule for each of the vertices, in its usual writing, is a sum of 3 terms of the form

$$ g\,f^{abc}\,[\eta^{\mu\nu}(p-k)^{\sigma}+\cdots] $$

(hence of 6 terms in total, separately counting each momentum). In the QCD action, these 6 terms are not present: the action only actually contains one of them, which is then re-written for 6 times and symmetrized in order to account for the symmetries with respect to the color and Lorentz indices. Therefore for each of these vertices you must count in a factor of $1/6$. Since in this case you have two of them, you must multiply your diagram by a factor of $1/36$. When multiplied by the factor of 18 that you derived, you obtain $1/2$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$
  1. Note that a symmetry factor of a Feynman diagram is conventionally the reciprocal of what OP calls a symmetry factor.

  2. Concretely, the symmetry factor of OP's Feynman diagram $$ J \times \rule[.5ex]{5mm}{.2mm}\bigcirc\rule[.5ex]{5mm}{.2mm}\times J$$ in the source picture is $S=4$. This is because of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetry of the loop legs and the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetry of the external legs.

  3. Alternatively, the symmetry factor $S=4$ can be deduced "by differentiation of sources", cf. eq. (3) in my Phys.SE answer here. Schematically, the calculation goes as follows: $$ \underbrace{\frac{1}{2!}}_{\text{from exp}}\times \underbrace{\left(\frac{1}{3!}\right)^2}_{\text{from vertices}} \times \underbrace{18}_{\text{combinations}} ~=~\frac{1}{4}.$$

  4. Now, the lectures were presumably talking about the self-energy, which is an amputated 2-pt vertex. Conventionally, the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetry of the external legs is here discarded, so the symmetry factor is then $S=2$, cf. e.g. my Phys.SE answer here.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.