4
$\begingroup$

I was reading some references on the slave-particle approach to the Kondo problem and Anderson model. It is known that the slave-particle is introduced in the large Hubbard $U$ limit of the system so that the Hilbert space for the localized orbital (e.g., $f$ electron) on a single site only include: $\{ | 0 \rangle, |\uparrow \rangle, |\downarrow\rangle \}$.

The constraint $n_f \le 1$ then becomes $$b^\dagger b + \sum_{\sigma} s^\dagger_\sigma s_\sigma =1$$ (here $b$ is boson and $s_\sigma$ is fermion). In the path integral, people say the measure of the integration becomes:

$$\int D(s^\dagger,s)D(b^\dagger,b)\delta(b^\dagger b + \sum_{\sigma} s^\dagger_\sigma s_\sigma-1)$$

and a Lagrange multiplier is then introduced which replace the Dirac delta function above by: $$\int D\lambda \ e^{i\lambda(b^\dagger b + \sum_{\sigma} s^\dagger_\sigma s_\sigma-1)}.$$

Here I would like to ask how does the imaginary time dependence entered into the constraint? Because originally we just have a constraint of the particle number operators, which can be transformed into a delta function at a specific time, say, at $\tau = 0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Which references? Which pages? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Nov 27, 2020 at 19:10

3 Answers 3

1
$\begingroup$

The constraint $\delta\left(z^{2}-1\right)$ is actually added for any time and space, rather than just $\tau=0$, thus, it need to be written as: $$\prod_{x, \tau} \delta\left(|z(x, \tau)|^{2}-1\right)$$ since $$\delta\left(|z(x, \tau)|^{2}-1\right)=\int_{-\infty+i c}^{+\infty+i c} d \lambda(x, \tau) e^{-i \lambda(\tau, x)\left(|z(x, \tau)|^{2}-1\right)}$$ thus, $$\prod_{x, \tau} \delta\left(|z(x, \tau)|^{2}-1\right)=\prod_{x, \tau}\left(\int_{-\infty+i c}^{+\infty+i c} d \lambda(x, \tau) e^{-i \lambda\left(|z(x, \tau)|^{2}-1\right)}\right)=\int \mathcal{D}[\lambda] e^{-i \int d^{D} x \lambda(x, \tau)\left(|z(x, \tau)|^{2}-1\right)}$$ where $$\int \mathcal{D}[\lambda]=\prod_{x, \tau} \int_{-\infty+i c}^{+\infty+i c} d \lambda(x, \tau)$$ Now, imaginary time dependence entered into the constraint $\lambda$. CH.8.1 of Polyakov also gives this detail.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Yes. You need a field $\lambda(x)$ in @Alexandro Nikolaenko's answer above. One lambda for each site or point $x$. $$ \int d[\lambda(x)]e^{\int dx \lambda(x)(b^\dagger(x) b(x)+...)} $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for the ansewer. But what makes me a bit confused is how the (imaginary) time dependence of $\lambda$ is introduced? $\endgroup$
    – Ogawa Chen
    Nov 28, 2020 at 20:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I should have said one $\lambda$ for each space-time point. $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Nov 28, 2020 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ can you give more details on how the time dependence is introduced? thanks. $\endgroup$
    – Ogawa Chen
    Nov 28, 2020 at 20:41
0
$\begingroup$

The delta function can be defined in the following way: $$2 \pi \delta(x)=\int e^{i \lambda x }d\lambda$$ Now, we can represent the path integral as a multidimensional integral and integrate it using the expression above.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.