2
$\begingroup$

I saw an exercise on the hyper virial theorem for central potential and, as I was looking for some clues, I found it hasn't been solved here, so after finding the solution I thought I may include it as well in case anyone finds it useful (for some reason, I only encountered it until graduate school).

Consider a central potential of the form $V(r)=kr^{-s}$. Show that the hypervirial theorem satisfies:

$$\langle p_r r^s\rangle=-\frac{i\hbar s}{2}\langle r^{s-1}\rangle$$

Where $p_r=-i\hbar\partial/\partial_r$ and $s\in Z$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The simplest way to prove it is by considering the commutator:

$[p_r,r^s]=r[p_r,r^{s-1}]+[p_r,r^{s-1}]r=r^2[p_r,r^{s-2}]+2r[p_r,r^{s-2}]+[p_r,r^{s-2}]r^2+...+=r^{s-1}[p_r,r]+...+[p_r,r]r^{s-1}=r^{s-1}(-i\hbar)+.. (\textrm{other} \ (s-2) \ \textrm{terms with} \ r^{s-1})..+(-i\hbar)r^{s-1}=-i\hbar sr^{s-1}$

Taking the expectation value:

$\langle[p_r,r^s]\rangle=-i\hbar\langle r^{s-1}\rangle$

On the other hand:

$\langle[p_r,r^s]\rangle=\langle p_r r^s-r^s p_r \rangle=\langle p_r r^s\rangle-\langle r^s p_r \rangle=\langle p_r r^s\rangle+\langle p_r r^s\rangle$

For stationary states. Therefore:

$\langle[p_r,r^s]\rangle=2\langle p_r r^s\rangle$

$$\langle p_r r^s\rangle=-\frac{i\hbar s}{2}\langle r^{s-1}\rangle$$

Which completes the proof. Feel free to add any other method you may consider useful.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.