1
$\begingroup$

Take a single proton and electron. Write $n,\ell,m$ for the quantum numbers of the electron, and $1/2$ or $-1/2$ for its spin.

The space of states of this system is the separable Hilbert space $V$ with orthonormal basis $$\{v_{n,\ell,m,\pm 1/2}\ : \ n,\ell,m \text{ as above}\}.$$ The Hamtiltonian $H$ is a Hermitian operator on $V$.

Question: I'm interested in the probability of one state turning into another, or equivalently in $$\langle v_{n,\ell,m,\pm 1/2}|H|v_{n',\ell',m',\pm' 1/2}\rangle.$$ What is this, as a function of $n,n',\ell,\ell',m,m',\pm, \pm'$?


I'm happy for the answer to be an integral, a sum etc. as long as it's a function of those variables. Since the state is completely described by $n,\ell,m,\pm 1/2$, no other variables (like $\textbf{S},\textbf{L},\psi,...$) should appear, unless they are some clearly-stated functions of $n,\ell,m,\pm 1/2$.


Edit: to be clear, $n,\ell,m$ are the principal, azithumal and magnetic quantum numbers.

Secondly, my question is what the real-life entries of $H$ are (because up to a little ambiguity they can be observed). i.e. what are leading few terms after the diagonal, and what physical effects are they caused by?

For instance, some effects which might add non-diagonal terms to $H$: $n$ changing due to absorption/emission of a photon, the spin may effect the energy a bit (causing an "$n$-$\pm 1/2$" off-diagonal term), some "$\ell$-$\pm 1/2$" off-diagonal terms due to the $\mathbf{L}\cdot\mathbf{S}$ terms I've seen before in similar contexts, etc.

$\endgroup$
14
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean the probability of measuring the system to be in one state given that it starts in another? The QM states themselves evolve deterministically, so if you are talking about the evolution of the state function then you shouldn't be talking about probabilities. Can you clarify? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 23:03
  • $\begingroup$ @AaronStevens Yes, I mean that. I was under the impression that (the square of) $\langle \psi | \exp(iHt/\hbar)| \varphi\rangle$ was the probability that, starting at $\varphi$, it is observed in state $\psi$ when the observation is made at time $t$. $\endgroup$
    – Pulcinella
    Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 23:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What physics are you considering in your Hamiltonian? Just the gross structure? Fine structure? Hyperfine structure? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 31, 2018 at 23:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Reference for this question is en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_rule#Summary_table and lecture notes referenced there. $\endgroup$
    – isometry
    Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 3:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Search for "Spontaneous emission rate for hydrogen" came up with this physicspages.com/pdf/Griffiths%20QM/… $\endgroup$
    – isometry
    Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 19:01

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The short answer would that this function is determined by what $H$ is, and $\langle v_{n,\ell,m,\pm 1/2}|H|v_{n',\ell',m',\pm' 1/2}\rangle$ is the so-call "matrix-element of $H$ in angular momentum basis".

If we need a general answer, we must look at the symmetry of H. Because the $|n,l,m,s\rangle$ is eigenstates of operator $\mathbf{L}^2$, $L_z$, $S^2$, $S_z$, $V(\mathbf{r})$. That means if $H$ commutes with all of these operators, there wouldn't be any off-diagonal elements. Real life example is the ideal Hydrogen atom without relativity.

If there is terms like $L\cdot S$(spin-orbit coupling of atoms) or $\hat{x}$(atom interaction with plane wave lights) in the Hamiltonian. Then $|n,l,m,s\rangle$ is no longer an eigenstate, since $[H,L_z]\ne 0$. These terms will produce off-diagonal elements and it lets 'neighboring' levels couple to each other. In particular, $L\cdot S$ is caused by the fact that a moving electron can 'feel' magnetic field due to relativity.

For a minimum example, let's write things explicitly in (x,y,z) basis for a spinless Hydrogen wave function, and calculate the first few matrix elements.

The wavefunction of hydrogen atom is $${\displaystyle \psi _{n\ell m}(r,\vartheta ,\varphi )={\sqrt {{\left({\frac {2}{na_{0}^{*}}}\right)}^{3}{\frac {(n-\ell -1)!}{2n(n+\ell )!}}}}e^{-\rho /2}\rho ^{\ell }L_{n-\ell -1}^{2\ell +1}(\rho )Y_{\ell }^{m}(\vartheta ,\varphi )}$$ according to wikipedia: Hydrogen atom

Put the formula in Mathematica

a0 = 0.1;
\[Psi][n_, l_, m_, x_, y_, z_] := 
   Sqrt[4 (n - l - 1)!/(a0^3 *n^3 (n + l)!)]
   E^(-2 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2 + z^2]/(n a0)/2) 2 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2 + z^2]/(n a0)^l  
  LaguerreL[n - l - 1, 2 l + 1,2 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2 + z^2]/(n a0)] 
  (-1)^m SphericalHarmonicY[l, m, ArcTan[z, Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]], ArcTan[x, y]]

Where $a0$ is an arbitrary Bohr radius that I defined.

Visualization:

plist = Flatten[Table[{n, l, m}, {n, 2}, {l, 0, n - 1}, {m, -l, l}], 2];
 Table[
  DensityPlot[
  Evaluate[Abs[\[Psi] @@ (i~Join~{x, 0, z})]]^2, {x, -20. a0, 
  20 a0}, {z, -20 a0, 20 a0}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}],
 {i, plist}]

Which gives enter image description here

Now let $H_I$ be the light matter interaction term. One of the simplest Hamiltonian is $$ H_I = \hat{V}(x,y,z) = c \hat{x}, $$ where $c$ is a constant and $\hat{x}$ is the $x$ position operator.

For $H_I=x$ the integral is easy without computer, but for a generic $H_I$ you can always calculate it numerically.

data = Table[
NIntegrate[
 Conjugate[\[Psi] @@ (i~Join~{x, y, z})] x (\[Psi] @@ (j~
      Join~{x, y, z})),
 {x, -20 a0, 20 a0}, {y, -20 a0, 20 a0}, {z, -20 a0,  a0}],
{i, plist}, {j, plist}]; // Quiet

It yields the matrix element of the $nlm=100,200,21-1,210,211$

Round[data, 0.0001]
(* {{0., 0., -0.0436, 0., 0.0436}, 
    {0., 0., 0.1882, 0., -0.1882}, 
    {-0.0436, 0.1882, 0., 0., 0.}, 
    {0., 0., 0., 0., 0.}, 
    {0.0436, -0.1882, 0., 0., 0.}} *)

The only non-zero elements are $\Delta l=\pm 1, \Delta m = \pm 1$. For $H_I= \hat{z}$, it is $\Delta m =0$. Combine together, it gives the selection rule $\Delta l=\pm 1, \Delta m = 0,\pm 1$ for electric dipole transition.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer, but I've already seen things like this, and am only looking for what actual numbers the entries of matrix $H$ are. I can't pretend I understand it properly if I only know how to get the answer in extremely vague terms. $\endgroup$
    – Pulcinella
    Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 21:21
  • $\begingroup$ Can you specify a Hamiltonian as an example? Maybe it's much easy to show if you give a $H$ in operator form, and then the matrix element can be computed. $\endgroup$
    – akpc
    Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 1:57
  • $\begingroup$ One point of the question is that I don't know what the Hamiltonian actually is. $\endgroup$
    – Pulcinella
    Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 9:20
  • $\begingroup$ In this case, the Hamiltonian in the above example is one of the most basic ones. $\endgroup$
    – akpc
    Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 13:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's true it is not a complete picture. We can add something to it to make it physical. For example, $H_I = \sum_k −e\hat{x}|E0|cos(ω_k t), $ where k are all the allowed wave vector in a box. With this Hamiltonian, you can know the transition probability of a atom under the influence of oscillating E field (light). And evaluating $\langle | x |\rangle$ is one of the difficult step. other terms only contribute a constant in front of it. $\endgroup$
    – akpc
    Commented Nov 12, 2018 at 16:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.