If I throw a bouncy ball at the ground very hard, it may rebound to a height greater than that from which it was thrown.
The coefficient of restitution is given by $$e=\dfrac{\text{speed of separation}}{\text{speed of approach}},$$ and I recall learning at school (several years ago) that $0\leqslant e\leqslant 1$. But this implies the speed of separation is always at most the speed of approach. Assuming the ball is thrown vertically downwards and rebounds vertically upwards, $v^2=u^2+2as$ gives us the rebound height, $s$: $$s=\dfrac{u^2}{2g}\,,$$ where $u$ is the speed of separation.
Now let $h$ be the height from which the ball was dropped. Then $v^2=2gh$, where $v$ is the speed of approach. Since $u\leqslant v$, we have $$s=\dfrac{u^2}{2g}\leqslant \dfrac{v^2}{2g}=\dfrac{2gh}{2g}=h.$$
But for some bouncy balls, this is not true, which appears to imply $e>1$. According to the Wikipedia page for coefficient of restitution, $e>1$ represents collisions in which energy is released, such as things which explode at the point of impact.
Is $e>1$ in the case of some bouncing balls? If so, is this because of some change in energy?
And when is it reasonable to assume $0\leqslant e\leqslant 1$? I think lots of elementary mechanics textbooks do this.