2
$\begingroup$

Let $G_n$ be the $n$-qubit Pauli group and $S$ an abelian subgroup which does not contain the element ($-I$). I know that if $S$ has $n$ generators then it specifies a single state $\left| \psi \right>$ which it stabilizes. Contrary to this I have seen it said that e.g. $\left| 0\right>$ has the stabilizer generator $Z$ and $\left| 0 0\right>$ the stabilizer generators $\Bbb{I}\otimes Z$ and $Z\otimes \Bbb{I}$. This hints at the following theorem which I can't find explicitly stated or proved:

The stabilizers of the state $\left| \psi \right>$ (i.e. elements of $G_n$ for which $g\left| \psi \right>=\left| \psi \right>$) form a abelian subgroup of $G_n$ which does not contain ($-I$) and has $n$ generators.

I assume the theorem to be true otherwise the association of $\left| 0 0\right>$ with the subgroup generated by $\Bbb{I}\otimes Z$ and $Z\otimes \Bbb{I}$ would not be unique. Am I correct? And how is this proved/disproved?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The proposition you make, as written, is false even for $n=1$ by the theorem you quote. Indeed the Pauli group on $n$ q-bits is a finite group, and so has finitely many abelian subgroups $H_i$ with $n$ generators which don't contain $-I$. Each specifies a state $| \psi_i \rangle$. $\{ |\psi_i \rangle \}$ can not be all the states because this is a finite set and there are infinitely many states. For a concrete example with $n=1$, the stabilizer of $\frac1{\sqrt3} |0 \rangle + \sqrt{\frac23} |1\rangle$ is trivial.

On the other hand, it is true that the stabilizer of any state is an abelian subgroup of $G_n$ which does not contain $-I$. That it does not contain $-I$ is clear since the stabilized state must have eigenvalue $1$ and by definition every vector is an eigenvector of $-I$ with eigenvalue $-1$. That it is abelian is not much more complicated to prove: given any two elements $g,h \in G_n$, it's easy to show that $\frac1{2} [g,h] \in \{0\} \cup G_n$ using the fact that every pair of elements in each 1 particle Pauli group either commutes or anticommutes. If an element is stabilized by both $g$ and $h$ it is in $\ker \frac1{2} [g,h]$, but all elements of $G_n$ are nondegenerate and hence $[g,h] = 0$. What fails is that the stabilizer of the state is in general not maximal among such subgroups of the Pauli group; indeed the stabilizer for almost all states (in the measure theoretic sense) is the trivial group.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.