0
$\begingroup$

What is the critical minimum angular speed of wheels or connected linear speed of motorbike along a straight line to avoid falling and remain stable on a motorbike in terms of moment of inertia $I$ of each of the two wheels of mass $m$, mass of rider plus bike frame $M$, height of their center of gravity $h?$

Is there a differential equation of motion for stability? Or do we just equate rotational (PE) and linear kinetic energies (KE) ?

EDIT

Hypothetically its handlebar is welded to the frame and cannot rotate, only open loop dynamics required for track holding. Thanks.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Many people do fine balancing without moving... $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Mar 13, 2018 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ Minimum speed depends on the rider's skill. There is no absolute minimum. Google for "track stand." $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 13, 2018 at 16:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Delightfully messy problem. There will be coupled ODEs for the lean of the bike and the turn of the handlebars. There will also be a gyroscopic damping effect. Don't expect a quick answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 13, 2018 at 17:21
  • $\begingroup$ Edited it. I want the simplest calculation with uniform motion of a motorbike along a straight line. $\endgroup$
    – Narasimham
    Commented Mar 13, 2018 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ Track standing requires closed loop corrections to be stable. I think it is fairly clear the OP is talking about open loop stability. $\endgroup$
    – cms
    Commented Mar 14, 2018 at 2:30

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

There is a misconception that gyroscopic motion is the main contributor to the vertical stability of a bicycle-like vehicle. In fact, the stability is largely a result of the geometry of the front wheel and steering mechanism, and the way that, as the bike tilts, the wheel will turn toward the direction of the tilt and "correct" it.

It is easily possible to design a bike (or motorbike) that is inherently unstable and can only be balanced by a gymnast.

Wikipedia:

If the steering of a bike is locked, it becomes virtually impossible to balance while riding. On the other hand, if the gyroscopic effect of rotating bike wheels is cancelled by adding counter-rotating wheels, it is still easy to balance while riding.[5][6] One other way that a bike can be balanced, with or without locked steering, is by applying appropriate torques between the bike and rider similar to the way a gymnast can swing up from hanging straight down on uneven parallel bars, a person can start swinging on a swing from rest by pumping their legs, or a double inverted pendulum can be controlled with an actuator only at the elbow.[33]

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I agree. But can you give a citation for the sentence "In fact, the stability is largely a result of the geometry...."; this sounds interesting and I am having trouble visualizing it. I hadn't realized there were factors, other than the rider's closed loop control of the system balance - illustrated by the wheelless snow bike (the unmotorized ones). $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 14, 2018 at 13:54
2
$\begingroup$

Here’s my concise answer, but see Wikipedia for a longer article with figures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_and_motorcycle_dynamics

Let $\theta$ denote the lean of the bike, $\varphi$ the turn of the handlebars, $\alpha \approx 73{}^\circ$ the “head angle” formed by the axis of the steering column to the ground, $x\approx$ 107 cm the wheelbase, $M\approx$ 70+10 kg the mass of the rider plus bike, $h\approx$ 110 cm the altitude of the CM, $m\approx$ 2 kg the mass of the front wheel, and $r\approx$ 35 cm its radius. The relevant moments of inertia will be ${{I}_{\omega }}=m{{r}^{2}}$, ${{I}_{\theta }}=M{{h}^{2}}$, and ${{I}_{\varphi }}=???$ for the steering assembly plus wheel.

The key issue is whether centrifugal forces are sufficient to keep the bike from tipping over to the side, but this will depend on the curvature of the trajectory, which depends on the turn of the handlebars and the wheelbase. Gyroscopic torques are less important.

Gyroscopic effects aside, the tipping torques are $${{I}_{\theta }}\ddot{\theta }=HMg\sin (\theta )-HM\tfrac{{{v}^{2}}}{x}\cos (\theta )\sin (\alpha )\sin (\varphi )$$

The front struts are curved to make the wheel self-righting when in contact with the ground, with some natural frequency $\Omega $. Its equilibrium turn angle exceeds the bike’s lean angle: $$\tan ({{\varphi }_{0}})/\tan (\theta )=\sec (\alpha )$$
Linearizing, we get $$ \left[ \begin{matrix} {\ddot{\theta }} \\ {\ddot{\varphi }} \\ \end{matrix} \right]=\left[ \begin{matrix} +g/h & -{{v}^{2}}/hx \\ +{{\Omega }^{2}}\sec (\alpha ) & -{{\Omega }^{2}} \\ \end{matrix} \right]\ \left[ \begin{matrix} \theta \\ \varphi \\ \end{matrix} \right] $$

We can infer the signs of the eigenvalues from the determinant without knowing the value of ${{I}_{\varphi }}$ or $\Omega$, and we may conclude that the coupled system will be unstable unless ${{v}^{2}}>gx\cos (\alpha )$, so $v>$ 1.75 m/s or 6.3 km/h. It is also essential that ${{\Omega }^{2}}>g/h$, which depends on having sufficient “rake” of the forks, weight on the front wheel, and low ${{I}_{\varphi }}$.

Gyroscopic torques contribute small correction terms proportional to the rates of change of steering, lean, and direction: $$\begin{align} & {{I}_{\theta }}\ddot{\theta }=\ldots +{{I}_{\omega }}\tfrac{v}{r}[\dot{\varphi }\sin (\alpha )+\tfrac{v}{x}\varphi ] \\ & {{I}_{\varphi }}\ddot{\varphi }=\ldots -{{I}_{\omega }}\tfrac{v}{r}[\dot{\theta }\cos (\alpha )] \\ \end{align}$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is way too complicated for me. I like to look at only the basics. $\endgroup$
    – Narasimham
    Commented Mar 14, 2018 at 7:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.