1
$\begingroup$

I was looking at the standard derivations of the energy stored in a capacitor, and any that I find seem to begin with the following or a similar integral:

$$W=U=\int_{Q=0}^{Q_f} \phi \, dq $$

Which makes sense, but I'd like to know if there's a way to derive the energy stored in a capacitor $U=\frac12 C \phi^2$ through the definition of work: $W=\int \vec F\cdot \, d\vec{s} $

Here's my work thus far. I can get the correct equation, but I'm not sure if there's a quicker way, or if my reasoning is flawed.

We start with the work needed to move the stored charge into it's placement:

$$W = \int_{r=\infty}^{r=0} {\vec{F} \cdot \, d\vec{s}} $$

Because $\vec{F} = q\vec{E}$, and $\vec{E} = -\vec\nabla \phi$:

$$\int_{r=\infty}^{r=0}{q\vec{E} \cdot \, d\vec{s} }= \int_{r=\infty}^{r=0}{q(-\vec\nabla \phi) \cdot \, d\vec{s} } $$

Our path $\vec{s}$ can be any curve parameterized by time, it is most convenient to be in spherical coordinates $r(t)\hat{r} +\theta(t)\hat{\theta}+\varphi(t)\hat{\varphi}$

So then $d\vec{s} = dr \, \hat{r} + d\theta \, \hat{\theta}+ d\varphi \, \hat{\varphi}$

$\vec\nabla \phi$ is path independent, and therefore does not vary with $\theta$ or $\varphi$, so $\vec\nabla \phi = \frac{\delta \phi}{\delta r} \hat{r} + 0\hat{\theta}+0\hat{\varphi}$, we have

$$\int_{r=\infty}^{r=0}{-q ({\frac{\delta \phi}{\delta r} \hat{r} + 0\hat{\theta}+0\hat{\varphi}}) \cdot \, (dr \, \hat{r} + d\theta \, \hat{\theta}+ d\varphi \, \hat{\varphi}) }= \int_{r=\infty}^{r=0}{-q {\frac{\delta \phi}{\delta r}} \, dr } = \int_{ \phi=0}^{ \phi= \phi_f}{-q \, d \phi } = - \int_{ \phi=0}^{ \phi= \phi_f}{C \phi \, d \phi} =-\frac{1}{2}C \phi_f^2$$

Using $W = - \Delta U$, we have

$$U=\frac{1}{2}C \phi_f^2$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The line element ds in spherical coordinates is different from what you wrote, but since you assume the angle change to be zero it didnt show up. $\endgroup$
    – Martin
    Commented Jun 4, 2020 at 9:14

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I think that most of what you've done is correct, and you will have benefitted from this detailed calculation. However, as you probably realise, it's unnecessarily complicated, and is unnecessarily restricted to a capacitor with spherical geometry. The point is that the value of your integral $$ \int _{r_1} ^{r_2}q [-\vec{\nabla \phi}].d \vec{s}$$ is path independent for a capacitor of any geometry, and is equal to $q[\phi (r_1)-\phi (r_2)]$.

In other words, the work do transferring charge q from one plate to the other is

Work done = charge transferred $\times$ pd between plates

which follows from the definition of pd!

At the end I think you get muddled about the purpose of your integrations. The point is that as the plates acquire charge the pd between them builds up according to $$\Delta \phi=\frac{Q}{C}.$$

So we need to integrate the work done as we transfer each small chunk, q (best now called $dQ$) of charge. So work done is given by $$W=\int _0 ^Q \frac{Q}{C} dQ.$$

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.